We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Original Investigation | Less Is More

Promoting Patient-Centered Counseling to Reduce Use of Low-Value Diagnostic Tests A Randomized Clinical Trial

Joshua J. Fenton, MD, MPH1,2; Richard L. Kravitz, MD, MSPH2,3; Anthony Jerant, MD1,2; Debora A. Paterniti, PhD2,4; Heejung Bang, PhD5; Donna Williams, MD3; Ronald M. Epstein, MD6,7; Peter Franks, MD1,2
[+] Author Affiliations
1Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California–Davis, Sacramento
2Center for Healthcare Policy and Research, University of California–Davis, Sacramento
3Department of Internal Medicine, University of California–Davis, Sacramento
4Department of Sociology, University of California–Davis, Sacramento
5Division of Public Health Sciences, University of California–Davis, Sacramento
6Department of Family Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York
7Center for Communications and Disparities Research, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York
JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(2):191-197. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.6840.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Importance  Low-value diagnostic tests have been included on primary care specialty societies’ “Choosing Wisely” Top Five lists.

Objective  To evaluate the effectiveness of a standardized patient (SP)-based intervention designed to enhance primary care physician (PCP) patient-centeredness and skill in handling patient requests for low-value diagnostic tests.

Design, Setting, and Participants  Randomized clinical trial of 61 general internal medicine or family medicine residents at 2 residency-affiliated primary care clinics at an academic medical center in California.

Interventions  Two simulated visits with SP instructors portraying patients requesting inappropriate spinal magnetic resonance imaging for low back pain or screening dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. The SP instructors provided personalized feedback to residents regarding use of 6 patient-centered techniques to address patient concerns without ordering low-value tests. Control group physicians received SP visits without feedback and were emailed relevant clinical guidelines.

Main Outcomes and Measures  The primary outcome was whether resident PCPs ordered SP-requested low-value tests during up to 3 unannounced SP clinic visits over 3 to 12 months follow-up, with patients requesting spinal magnetic resonance imaging, screening dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, or headache neuroimaging. Secondary outcomes included PCP patient-centeredness and use of targeted techniques (both coded from visit audiorecordings), and SP satisfaction with the visit (0-10 scale).

Results  Of 61 randomized resident PCPs (31 control group and 30 intervention group), 59 had encounters with 155 SPs during follow-up. Compared with control PCPs, intervention PCPs had similar patient-centeredness (Measure of Patient-Centered Communication, 43.9 [95% CI, 42.0 to 45.7] vs 43.7 [95% CI, 41.8 to 45.6], adjusted mean difference, −0.2 [95% CI, −2.9 to 2.5]; P = .90) and used a similar number of targeted techniques (5.4 [95% CI, 4.9 to 5.8] vs 5.4 [95% CI, 4.9 to 5.8] on a 0-9 scale, adjusted mean difference, 0 [95% CI, −0.7 to 0.6]; P = .96). Residents ordered low-value tests in 41 SP encounters (26.5% [95% CI, 19.7%-34.1%]) with no significant difference in the odds of test ordering in intervention PCPs relative to control group PCPs (adjusted odds ratio, 1.07 [95% CI, 0.49-2.32]). Rates of test ordering among intervention and control PCPs were similar for all 3 SP cases. The SPs rated visit satisfaction higher among intervention than control PCPs (8.5 [95% CI, 8.1-8.8] vs 7.8 [95% CI, 7.5-8.2], adjusted mean difference, 0.6 [95% CI, 0.1-1.1]).

Conclusions and Relevance  An SP-based intervention did not improve the patient-centeredness of SP encounters, use of targeted interactional techniques, or rates of low-value test ordering, although SPs were more satisfied with intervention than control residents.

Trial Registration  clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01808664

Figures in this Article


Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 1.
Flow Diagram of Primary Care Resident Physician Enrollment and Allocation
Graphic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 2.
Adjusted Probability of Requested Test Ordering By Study Group and Specific Test

Symbols indicate probability, and error bars, 95% confidence interval.

Graphic Jump Location




Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

1 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections

The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis
Make the Diagnosis: Does This Patient With Headaches Have a Migraine or Need Neuroimaging?

The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis
Original Article: Does This Patient With Headache Have a Migraine or Need Neuroimaging?