We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Research Letter |

Patterns of Institutional Review of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Appropriateness and the Effect on Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes

Nihar R. Desai, MD, MPH1,2; Craig S. Parzynski, MS2; Harlan M. Krumholz, MD, SM1,2; Karl E. Minges, MPH2; John C. Messenger, MD3; Brahmajee K. Nallamothu, MD, MPH4,5; Jeptha P. Curtis, MD1,2
[+] Author Affiliations
1Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
2Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale–New Haven Health Services Corporation, New Haven, Connecticut
3Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora
4Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
5Ann Arbor Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan
JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(12):1988-1990. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.6217.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


This Research Letter reports heterogeneity in institutional review of percutaneous coronary intervention appropriateness and calls for the identification of effective strategies to improve institutional review.

More than 600 000 percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) are performed each year, accounting for more than $12 billion in health care spending.1 In 2009, the American College of Cardiology, American Heart Association, and several other professional organizations released appropriate use criteria (AUC) for coronary revascularization2 designed to support better selection of patients for PCI. Prior studies1,3,4 suggest that as many as 1 in 6 nonacute PCIs may be inappropriate (rarely appropriate). Although the AUC have received substantial attention, little is known about how institutions have responded to them, specifically whether they have developed mechanisms for internal review of PCI appropriateness. Furthermore, whether these review practices are associated with differences in procedural appropriateness, quality of care, and patient outcomes remains uncertain.

Figures in this Article

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview


Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Proportion of Nonacute PCIs Classified as Rarely Appropriate

A, Hospital variation in the proportion of rarely appropriate PCIs stratified by review strategy. Each point represents the proportion of rarely appropriate PCIs performed at an individual hospital. The horizontal line represents the median of hospitals, and the bottom and top lines of the rectangle represent the 25th and 75th percentiles.

Graphic Jump Location




Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles