We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Viewpoint | Less Is More

The Divide Between Breast Density Notification Laws and Evidence-Based Guidelines for Breast Cancer Screening Legislating Practice

Jennifer S. Haas, MD, MSc1; Celia P. Kaplan, DrPH, MA2
[+] Author Affiliations
1Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
2Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(9):1439-1440. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.3040.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


This Viewpoint considers that breast density notification laws are unlikely to improve our understanding of breast cancer risk, screening, and diagnosis or to save lives and instead may result in substantial personal harms and societal costs.

In 2003, Dr Nancy Cappello was stunned by her diagnosis of breast cancer just 6 weeks after normal findings on mammography.1 She subsequently discovered medical literature documenting the lower sensitivity of mammography in women with dense breast tissue, as well as the association between greater breast density and increased cancer risk. Frustrated by the reluctance of her physicians to discuss the potential role of breast density in her diagnosis, Cappello pursued legislation in Connecticut, where she lived. The legislation was enacted, requiring insurers to cover breast ultrasonography as an adjunctive screening test to mammography for women with dense breast tissue and to notify women of their breast density results and the potential effect on the sensitivity of screening. As of April 2015, breast density notification laws had been enacted in 22 states and are advancing in an additional 13 states, and federal legislation has been introduced.2 Modeling suggests that at least 28 million women in the United States between the ages of 40 and 74 years (43% of women in this age group) could be affected by such legislation.3

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

1 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles
Authors' Reply. J Am Coll Radiol 2015;12(11):1135-6.