0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
In This Issue of Archives of Internal Medicine |

In This Issue of Archives of Internal Medicine FREE

Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(5):378. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2011.42.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

COLLABORATIVE CARE OF OPIOID-ADDICTED PATIENTS IN PRIMARY CARE USING BUPRENORPHINE

Opioid addiction can be effectively treated with buprenorphine in primary care settings, but this treatment remains underused. Alford et al describe 5 years of experience in treating opioid addiction in an urban academic primary care practice with collaboration between nurse care managers and generalist physicians. At 12 months, 51% of patients (196 of 382) underwent successful treatment (ie, retention or taper after 6 months). Of patients remaining in treatment at 12 months, 93% were no longer using illicit opioids or cocaine. Patients who, on admission, were older, employed, and used illicit buprenorphine had significantly higher odds of treatment success. Collaborative care proved to be an effective model for providing and monitoring treatment of opioid addiction using buprenorphine.

See Article

THE EFFECT OF GUIDED CARE TEAMS ON THE USE OF HEALTH SERVICES

In the guided care model, 2 to 5 primary care physicians partner with a colocated registered nurse to provide comprehensive care to community-dwelling patients who have several chronic conditions and complex health care needs. This article reports the effects of guided care on patients' use of health services during the first 20 months of a multisite, cluster-randomized trial (n = 850). Across the entire study population, guided care reduced episodes of home health care by 30% (95% confidence interval [CI], 7%-47%). In a preplanned analysis of a 40% subsample (Kaiser Permanente patients), guided care reduced skilled nursing facility admissions by 47% (95% CI, 11%-69%) and days by 52% (95% CI, 16%-72%).

See Article

DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF A BRIEF COGNITIVE ASSESSMENT TOOL: THE SWEET 16

Cognitive impairment can have a negative impact on the overall health and quality of life for older adults, but it is often unrecognized. Furthermore, current assessment instruments are underused, lack sensitivity, or may be restricted by copyright laws. To address these limitations, Fong et al created a new cognitive assessment tool, the Sweet 16, which correlated highly with the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) (Spearman r, 0.94; P < .001). Validated against an independent gold standard for dementia, the area under the curve is 0.84 for the Sweet 16 and 0.81 for the MMSE (P = .06). Across a range of education levels, the area under the curve for higher education (≥12 years) for the Sweet 16 was 0.90 and for the MMSE, 0.84 (P = .03). The Sweet 16 is simple, quick to administer, and will be available via open access.

See Article

ASSOCIATION OF ALCOHOL INTAKE WITH PANCREATIC CANCER MORTALITY IN NEVER SMOKERS

Alcoholic beverage consumption is causally related to a number of cancers including oral cavity, pharynx, larynx, esophagus, liver, colorectum, and female breast. However, it has never been linked definitively to pancreatic cancer despite the fact that heavy alcohol consumption is a cause of acute and chronic pancreatitis. The lack of convincing evidence is in part due to concerns about study design and potential residual confounding by smoking. The American Cancer Society's Cancer Prevention Study II is a large prospective study of more than 1 million adults, which began in 1982. After 26 years of follow-up, liquor consumption of 3 or more drinks per day was associated with an excess risk of pancreatic cancer mortality after adjustment for smoking history, as well as in lifelong never smokers. Overall, the design and size of this study help to resolve concerns about inconsistencies observed in other studies of the alcohol-pancreatic cancer association.

See Article

COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF GOAL SETTING IN DIABETES CARE

Group medical visits are an innovative method of potentially improving diabetes control. This study compared a group clinic approach to diabetes and nutrition education with a novel clinician-led, patient-centered group medical clinic model: Empowering Patients in Care (EPIC). The 12-week EPIC model engages small groups of diabetic patients in learning to set personalized goals for diet and exercise changes, home monitoring of blood pressure and sugar, and managing complex medication regimens. In addition, the EPIC groups focus on integrating those goals into daily action plans and empowering participants to talk to their physicians and caregivers about their challenges and success. In this study, participants in the EPIC groups had significant improvements in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels immediately following the active intervention compared with participants in the diabetes education groups and these differences persisted at 1-year follow-up. Primary care–based diabetes group clinics that include structured goal-setting approaches with self-management can significantly improve diabetes control after intervention and maintain improvements for at least 1 year.

See Article

Tables

References

Correspondence

CME
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

225 Views
0 Citations
×

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Jobs