We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Invited Commentary |

The Elusive Benefits of Chronic Care Management Comment on “The Effect of Guided Care Teams on the Use of Health Services”

Jill Bernstein, PhD
Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(5):466-467. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2010.542.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


One of the pillars of health care system reform efforts in the United States is better management of serious chronic illness. This will, we believe, improve quality and decrease costs by preventing avoidable complications, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations.

It is therefore frustrating to practicing health care professionals, researchers, and policymakers that carefully designed studies of programs implementing evidence-based best practices for patients with serious multiple chronic conditions have shown only limited success. For example, in this issue of the Archives, Boult et al present the results of a multicenter randomized study examining the effect of guided care on the care of patients older than 65 years. The intervention, based on best practices, included comprehensive geriatric assessment, evidence-based planning, case management, transitional care, self-management, and caregiver support. The care was provided by interdisciplinary teams, including physicians and nurses. However, despite the comprehensiveness of the intervention, the effects on service use were minimal.

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

4 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles