Author Affiliations: Institute of Medical Psychology (Drs Kendel and Knoll), Institute of Gender in Medicine (Dr Regitz-Zagrosek), and Center for Cardiovascular Research (Dr Regitz-Zagrosek), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Coordination Center for Clinical Trials, Leipzig, Germany (Dr Gelbrich); Institute of Psychology, University of Education, Freiburg, Germany (Dr Wirtz); and Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin, Berlin (Drs Lehmkuhl, Hetzer, and Regitz-Zagrosek).
Depression is a prevalent condition in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) and is often associated with a less favorable health status. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between depression and physical functioning in patients undergoing CABG.
The analyses were based on a sample of 883 consecutive subjects (aged 35-93 years; 19.8% women) undergoing CABG. Depression was assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ); the subscale “physical functioning” was taken from the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey. Questionnaires were administered 1 to 3 days before surgery (T1) and 2 months (T2) and 1 year (T3) after surgery.
A cross-lagged path analytic model showed that an increase in depressive symptoms predicted a decrease in physical functioning (βT1-T2 = −0.15 [P < .001]; βT2-T3 = −0.17 [P < .001]), but not the other way around. Multigroup comparisons revealed one moderator effect: in patients with systolic heart failure (left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF], ≤45%), the effect of depression on physical functioning from T2 to T3 was significantly stronger than in patients with preserved LVEF (βT2-T3 = −0.30 [P < .001] vs βT2-T3 = −0.14 [P < .001]; χ2diff = 3.885 [P = .049]).
More attention should be paid to diagnosis and treatment of depression in patients undergoing CABG. After surgery, patients with systolic heart failure and depressive symptoms in particular seem at risk of a deterioration of their physical functioning.
No other human organ is as closely associated with vitality and capability as the human heart. It is not surprising that people with coronary heart disease (CHD) develop depressive symptoms in reaction to their illness or that patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) often become depressed owing to changes in lifestyle after surgery. Because the diagnosis of depression includes somatic symptoms such as changes in appetite, sleeping problems, and a loss of energy, symptoms of depression and symptoms of CHD overlap to a certain extent. Yet several studies have shown that depression is an independent risk factor for functional impairment1 and cardiac events2 and is also associated with mortality after CABG.3
With respect to depression, several confounding variables have been reported. In patients with congestive heart failure (HF), depression shows a prevalence of up to 40%4 and is a strong predictor for the worsening of HF symptoms.5,6 Higher prevalence rates of depression in CABG patients have also been reported for women compared with men,7,8 younger patients,1 and socially isolated patients.9 However, studies have not yet shown clearly how the influence of depression on various outcomes differs among these subgroups of patients. Even though depression has been shown to have a considerably negative impact on the physical functioning of patients undergoing CABG, the other way around is also likely: a bad health status may lead to an increase in depressive symptoms. In this case, depressive symptoms could be primarily an epiphenomenon of the somatic illness.
Statements on the direction of influence can only be made within a model that longitudinally considers both paths (from depression to health status and from health status to depression). For correlative data, cross-lagged panel designs that control for multivariate dependencies among the central study variables are the most valid designs.10 Surprisingly, the direction of predictive inference has not yet been clarified for this context: Is depression predictive of a deterioration in health status after the surgery or is a change in health status for the worse predictive of an increase in depression? To answer this question, we tested the longitudinal, cross-lagged associations between depressive symptoms and physical functioning within a single model. In addition, we sought to explore whether the relationship between depression and physical functioning was moderated by gender, age, partner status, or HF.
After the institutional review board approved the study protocol, potential candidates were identified through daily screening of the admission records. The initial sample consisted of 1570 consecutive patients undergoing CABG at the Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Deutsches Herzzentrum (German Heart Institute) Berlin, Berlin, Germany, between January 1, 2005, and July 31, 2008. Exclusion criteria were (1) inability to read or answer the study questionnaires (eg, dementia, difficulties with the language) and (2) age younger than 18 years. All patients participating provided written consent. Questionnaires were administered 1 to 3 days before surgery (T1), 2 months after surgery (T2), and 1 year after surgery (T3). Clinical and sociodemographic data were abstracted from case report forms.
The depression module of the 9-Item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)11 was used to assess depressive symptoms. The sum score ranges from 0 to 27, with higher values indicating higher levels of depression. The German version12 has shown excellent reliability, validity,13 and sensitivity.14 The subscale “physical functioning” (PF) from the 36-Item Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form health survey (SF-36)15 was used to assess the subjective PF. The scale consists of 10 items eliciting concrete subjective responses about physical limitations due to health, such as using stairs and lifting objects. The raw score was transformed to a score ranging from 0 (severe impairment) to 100 (no impairment). Excellent psychometric properties have been reported for the German version of the SF-36.16
Structural equation modeling was used to estimate and evaluate the cross-sectional and prospective associations of depression and PF. For correlative data in panel studies, cross-lagged panel designs allow for a direct test of the predictive relationship between 2 variables. This method takes into account time precedence17 and controls for multivariate dependencies of the antecedent predictor variables.10 Therefore, in addition to the cross-lagged paths between depression and PF and between PF and depression (Figure 1, path a), the longitudinal structural paths reflecting changes in depression and PF, respectively (Figure 1, path c) as well as the cross-sectional covariances between depression and PF (Figure 1, path b) were taken into account. The predictive priority of either PF or depression could be assumed only if the respective predictor (depression or PF) made an independent contribution to the crossed criterion (PF or depression, respectively) after controlling for the effects at earlier time points and cross-sectional associations.
The cross-lagged panel design showing cross-lagged longitudinal (a), cross-sectional (b), and longitudinal (c) paths. PF indicates physical functioning; T1,1 to 3 days before surgery; T2, 2 months after surgery; and T3, 1 year after surgery.
Because cross-lagged path models are based on continuous variables, the scales for depression and PF were used in their continuous form. Depression and PF were understood as latent constructs, which were estimated by 2 randomly selected split-half “subtests” at all 3 measurement points.18 To detect moderator effects, constraints that required the cross-lagged paths to be equal were imposed on the model and tested through hierarchical model comparisons. The following subgroups were tested for differences in the cross-lagged paths: (1) patients with systolic HF, as defined by a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) below 45%, vs preserved LVEF19; (2) age below vs above the median of 67 years; (3) men vs women; and (4) patients living alone vs living with a partner.
The statistical analyses were performed using AMOS 7.020 for structural equation modeling. Statistical software SPSS 16.0 was used to conduct t tests for independent samples; if the variables were categorical, χ2 tests were used. Changes in depression and PF over time were tested by ANOVAs. For all analyses, P < .05 was considered statistically significant.
Of 1917 consecutive patients, 1610 consented to the study; 1570 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria and returned the questionnaire at the first measurement point (Figure 2). Of these patients, 112 (7.1%) died during the 1-year follow-up. For all patients who were not identified as deceased, we were able to confirm vital status by directly contacting the patient or his or her general practitioner. A total of 883 patients (56.2%) responded at all 3 time points (“continuer sample”).
Flowchart of participants.
Missing data due to item nonresponse were estimated using the expectation maximization algorithm.21 To show potential effects of attrition on a unit level, Table 1 gives all study variables for the full sample as well as for continuers and noncontinuers separately. A higher proportion of noncontinuers compared with continuers were living without a partner, were more often female, and reported higher levels of depression and lower levels of PF.
Because patient dropout did not occur completely at random, we decided to repeat the analyses using the full information maximum likelihood procedure22 as implemented in AMOS to estimate the empirical covariance matrix from all available information including all available data from the full sample (N = 1570).
Descriptive data are presented in Table 1. The following results are presented for the continuer sample (n = 883; 19.8% women) unless otherwise specified. Mean age was 66.74 years (range, 35-93 years), mean LVEF was 56.29%. The prevalence for major depression in our patient population was 8.5%, compared with a rate of 3.8% obtained from a German representative sample also using the PHQ-9.22 Over 1 year, PF improved significantly (main effect for time: F2,882 = 80.809; P < .001). Accordingly, there was a decline in depressive symptoms (main effect for time, F2,882 = 3.132; P = .04).
Figure 3 displays the empirical estimates for the cross-lagged panel model, which allows the identification of the predictive directionality between the constructs “depression” and “PF” (overall model fit, χ2 = 275.28; P < .001). Indices of approximate fit that are robust to sample size showed a sufficiently close fit of model variables (CMIN/df [minimum value of the discrepancy function divided by degrees of freedom], 6.714; RMSEA [root mean square error of approximation], 0.08; CFI [comparative fit index], 0.98; and NFI [normed fit index], 0.97). The model fit can thus be classified as acceptable to good. Controlling for the respective cross-sectional and baseline scores, depressive symptoms showed a pronounced predictive priority over PF. This predictive priority could be demonstrated for both time intervals: from baseline (T1) to 2 months after surgery (T2) and from 2 months (T2) to 1 year after surgery (T3). In contrast, the paths from prior PF to later depression were not significant (Figure 3).
Cross-lagged relationships between depressive symptoms and physical functioning (PF) over time (n = 883). Ovals indicate unobserved latent variables. Values are standardized regression weights (β). All paths shown are significant except for those drawn with a broken line. *** P < .001. Testing for the predictive priority of depression vs physical functioning: χ2diff = 26.624; P < .001.
Nested multigroup model comparisons were conducted to detect moderator effects. Standardized regression weights (β) for all subgroups are given in Table 2. Assuming group independent model parameters by simultaneously restricting all model paths to be equal between patients with systolic HF and patients with preserved LVEF, no overall group differences could be found (χ2diff = 8.712; P = .07). However, on a path-specific level the path leading from depression 2 months after surgery to PF 1 year after surgery indicated significant group differences (χ2diff = 3.885; P = .049). Thus, in patients with systolic HF, changes in depression over this period were significantly more closely related to changes in PF compared with patients with preserved LVEF (Table 2). No moderator effects were found for gender (χ2diff = 4.393; P = .36), age (χ2diff = 1.876; P = .76), and partner status (χ2diff = 2.009; P = .73). For these groups, the unconstrained initial model was valid.
To avoid interpretation bias caused by dropout of patients, the analyses were repeated on the full sample (N = 1570) (see “Methods” section). Again, standardized regression weights indicated that depressive symptomatology was related to deterioration of PF (βT1-T2 = −0.12 [P < .001]; βT2-T3 = −0.18 [P < .001]; continuer sample, βT1-T2 = −0.15 [P < .001]; and βT2-T3 = −0.17 [P < .001]), whereas there was no evidence for a predictive inference from PF to depressive symptomatology (βT1-T2 = −0.01 [P = .71]; βT2-T3 = −0.04 [P = .26]; continuer sample, βT1-T2 = −0.03 [P = .44]; and βT2-T3 = −0.01 [P = .74]). Model fits were also good (CMIN/df, 3.934; RMSEA, 0.04; CFI, 0.98; and NFI, 0.97). In accordance with the analyses based on the continuer sample, no moderator effects were found for gender, age, and partner status. In patients with systolic HF, the path from depression 2 months after surgery to PF 1 year after surgery was significant (βT2-T3 = −0.34 [P < .001]; continuer sample, βT2-T3 = −0.30 [P < .001]). Thus, the danger of an α error, ie, the danger of postulating a difference where there is none, was minimized.
The present study provides strong support for the assumption that depression may lead to a deterioration of PF in patients after CABG, but a bad health status is not predictive of an increase in depression in this context. The influence of depression on the course of recovery after cardiac events or a bypass operation has been the object of intense debate over the past few years. Findings of Rumsfeld et al23 and Mallik et al1 showed that depression appeared to be a strong inverse risk factor for worse quality of life after CABG. In a study testing the opposite path, post-CABG depression status was predicted by somatic factors such as chronic noncardiac illnesses, postoperative fatigue, and shortness of breath.8
Surprisingly, to our knowledge, no study to date has assessed the bidirectional influences of depression on PF and PF on depression in the context of CABG. To meet the methodological challenge that is connected to this question, the present study applied a cross-lagged panel design. Three associations were possible: (1) poorer PF could be predictive of an increase in depressive symptoms, (2) a higher level of depression could be predictive of a deterioration in PF, or (3) there could be a reciprocal relationship with no superiority of either path. In the present study, depressive symptoms clearly predicted PF, but PF did not predict depressive symptomatology. The predictive priority of depression over PF could be demonstrated for both time intervals of interest: from baseline to 2 months after surgery and from 2 months to 1 year after surgery. With the use of multigroup comparisons in structural equation modeling, it was also possible to directly compare several subgroups with respect to the previously described longitudinal paths. The strength of these paths did not differ with respect to gender, thus departing from the results of other studies, which reported a stronger relationship between depression and PF in women than in men.8,24 It should be noted that comparison with these studies is of limited value, because none of these studies controlled for the cross-sectional and cross-lagged relationships. Our results indicate that only in the subgroup of patients with systolic HF did the paths differ from that of patients without HF. Two months after surgery, there was a significant effect from depression on PF in patients with systolic HF, which could not be shown in patients with preserved LVEF. Several studies have explored the relationship between depression and self-reported quality of life23,25 or risk of functional decline26 in patients with HF. In patients undergoing bypass surgery, longstanding HF may have already led to a reduction of resources and may thus amplify the stress that is induced by the surgery, whereas patients without a history of HF may have psychological resources that enable them to cope better with the additional stressor of a CABG surgery.
Several psychological mechanisms by which depression may produce increased risk for patients with CHD have been studied. For example, depression is associated with a number of behavioral risk factors27 and nonadherence to medication.28 How these mechanisms influence the relationship between depression and PF is not yet clear. As our study was not experimental in design, the existence of additional variables influencing the association between depression and PF cannot be excluded and should be subject to further studies. Further studies are also needed to elucidate possible behavioral and pathophysiological pathways for the association of depression and PF in CABG patients.
There are possible limitations to this study, which should be taken into account when interpreting the results. First, the PHQ-9 is a brief screening instrument to assess severity of depressive symptoms and cannot replace a formal clinical diagnosis of depression. However, since there is strong evidence for both high sensitivity and specificity when diagnosing major depression,14 this instrument seems appropriate for the investigation of epidemiological questions. Second, with respect to the first measurement point, it cannot be excluded that anxiety and the exceptional mental state before surgery may have influenced the response to the depression items at the first measurement point. Third, the study had to face a substantial dropout rate owing to mortality and morbidity. In addition, we cannot exclude minor associations between cognitive impairment and completion of questionnaires. To avoid a systematic bias by interpreting results based on the reduced sample, all analyses were repeated using the full data set, estimating the missing units. These analyses provide additional support for our main finding that depression is predictive for PF. Fourth, all patients were recruited at a single center, the Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin. Given the high reputation of this institution, it is possible that more complicated cases may have been referred to this hospital and thus the study sample may represent a less healthy population.
Our results emphasize the vitally important role depression plays in the CABG recovery process. This was confirmed by evidence of a unidirectional relationship of depression with PF. On the basis of these results, screening for depression should be recommended both before and after CABG treatment. After surgery, this seems to be particularly important for patients with heart failure.
Correspondence: Friederike Kendel, PhD, Institute of Medical Psychology, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Luisenstraße 57, 10117 Berlin, Germany (email@example.com).
Accepted for Publication: July 30, 2010.
Author Contributions:Study concept and design: Kendel, Gelbrich, Lehmkuhl, and Regitz-Zagrosek. Acquisition of data: Kendel, Lehmkuhl, and Hetzer. Analysis and interpretation of data: Kendel, Gelbrich, Wirtz, Lehmkuhl, and Knoll. Drafting of the manuscript: Kendel and Wirtz. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Kendel, Gelbrich, Wirtz, Lehmkuhl, Knoll, Hetzer, and Regitz-Zagrosek. Statistical analysis: Kendel, Gelbrich, Wirtz, and Knoll. Obtained funding: Regitz-Zagrosek. Administrative, technical, and material support: Gelbrich and Lehmkuhl. Study supervision: Knoll, Hetzer, and Regitz-Zagrosek.
Financial Disclosure: None reported.
Funding/Support: This study was funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF).
Additional Contributions: Elizabeth Morrison and Anna Jonen provided editorial assistance.
Thank you for submitting a comment on this article. It will be reviewed by JAMA Internal Medicine editors. You will be notified when your comment has been published. Comments should not exceed 500 words of text and 10 references.
Do not submit personal medical questions or information that could identify a specific patient, questions about a particular case, or general inquiries to an author. Only content that has not been published, posted, or submitted elsewhere should be submitted. By submitting this Comment, you and any coauthors transfer copyright to the journal if your Comment is posted.
* = Required Field
Disclosure of Any Conflicts of Interest*
Indicate all relevant conflicts of interest of each author below, including all relevant financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including, but not limited to, employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speakers’ bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued. If all authors have none, check "No potential conflicts or relevant financial interests" in the box below. Please also indicate any funding received in support of this work. The information will be posted with your response.
Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more
Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features
Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)
Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours
Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.
Download citation file:
Web of Science® Times Cited: 8
Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.
Users' Guides to the Medical Literature
Consider the following statement: In patients with in-stent stenosis of coronary artery bypass...
Users' Guides to the Medical Literature
Table 9.2-3 Refuted Evidence From Observational Studiesa
All results at
and access these and other features:
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a link to reset your password.
Enter your username and email address. We'll send instructions on how to reset your password to the email address we have on record.
Athens and Shibboleth are access management services that provide single sign-on to protected resources. They replace the multiple user names and passwords necessary to access subscription-based content with a single user name and password that can be entered once per session. It operates independently of a user's location or IP address. If your institution uses Athens or Shibboleth authentication, please contact your site administrator to receive your user name and password.