We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Comment & Response |

Adjunctive Diagnostic Procedures for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Auras R. Atreya, MD1; Amir Lotfi, MD1
[+] Author Affiliations
1Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Baystate Medical Center/Tufts University School of Medicine, Springfield, Massachusetts
JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(4):647-648. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.8003.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


To The Editor We read with great interest the study published by Fröhlich et al1 regarding long-term survival in patients undergoing fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or intravascular ultrasonography (IVUS)-guided PCI vs PCI guided by angiography alone. In this large cohort study, using a PCI registry in London, England, the authors expertly demonstrate that neither FFR nor IVUS, when used as adjuncts to PCI, translate into improved long-term survival in these “real-world” patients.1 These findings are not entirely surprising, since prior randomized studies and meta-analyses have failed to show a mortality benefit for PCI in addition to optimal medical therapy in the management of stable coronary disease.2,3 However, this study consisted of a more heterogeneous population than those that have been previously studied. Nearly 40% of the study population consisted of patients with non–ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, where early PCI for high-risk patients is associated with a mortality benefit and is recommended by the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association guidelines.4 Yet, there was no overall difference in mortality across the PCI strategies. This is perhaps explained by the fact that FFR and IVUS are only adjunctive devices used to guide and/or facilitate PCI, which is the ultimate interventional therapy in question. In addition, the patient population also significantly differed in the degree of intermediate coronary stenosis (7.5% in the angiography group had stenosis <75% as opposed to 38.7% in the FFR group and 18.5% in the IVUS group),1 which may influence the baseline risk of mortality. Therefore, comparing outcomes in these highly heterogenous groups is fraught with risk, despite careful attempts by the authors to minimize confounding using propensity matching.


Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.