0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
In This Issue of Archives of Internal Medicine |

In This Issue of Archives of Internal Medicine FREE

Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(9):929. doi:10.1001/archinte.164.9.929.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

GOOD AND BAD DYING FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF TERMINALLY ILL MEN

To help those with terminal illness achieve the best possible experience of dying, clinicians need to know what their patients want and what they want to avoid at the very end of life. In this study, 26 men who were identified as having terminal heart disease or cancer described good and bad deaths. The interviews were tape recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using grounded theory methods. The authors found heterogeneity in responses to questions about good deaths, bad deaths, and preferred dying experiences. Participants voiced multiple reasons for why dying in one's sleep led to a good death and why prolonged dying or suffering led to a bad death. In discussing the end of life with terminally ill patients, clinicians may want to identify not only their patients' views of good and bad deaths, but also how the identified attributes contribute to a good or bad death.

See Article

RISK FACTORS FOR VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM IN MEDICAL PATIENTS

Alikhan et al performed logistic regression analysis on data from patients enrolled in a medical thromboprophylaxis study to evaluate if different types of acute medical illness and patient factors were independent risk factors for venous thromboembolism. Multiple logistic regression analysis indicated that the presence of an acute infectious disease, age above 75 years, cancer, and a history of venous thromboembolism were independently associated with venous thromboembolism. These findings allow recognition of individuals at increased risk of venous thromboembolism. Currently, there is no precise patient risk profile for medical illness that would precipitate a mandatory recommendation for thromboprophylaxis, and the authors believe that these findings will facilitate the formulation of a risk-assessment model based on clinical evidence.

See Article

THE PREVALENCE OF REDUCED GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE IN OLDER HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS AND ITS ASSOCIATION WITH CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE: A REPORT FROM THE ANTIHYPERTENSIVE AND LIPID-LOWERING TREATMENT TO PREVENT HEART ATTACK TRIAL

In this study, Rahman et al evaluated baseline renal function in 40 514 hypertensive patients 55 years or older, who were enrolled in the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT). The authors used the simplified Modification of Diet in Renal Disease study equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and examined the prevalence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in patients with different levels of GFR. Of the patients, 57% had mild (60-89 mL/min per 1.73 m2), 17.2% had moderate (30-59 mL/min per 1.73 m2), and 0.6% had severe reductions in GFR (≤29 mL/min per 1.73 m2). Compared with patients with mildly reduced or normal GFR, patients with moderate or severe reductions were more likely to have had a prior myocardial infarction or stroke, have ischemic changes on electrocardiogram (ECG), and have left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) on ECG. A decrease in GFR of 10 mL/min per 1.73 m2 was independently associated with a 6% higher risk for CVD and 14% higher risk for ECG-LVH. These data demonstrate that the prevalence of reduced GFR is high in older hypertensive patients. Patients with moderate or severe reduction in GFR are more likely to have a history of CVD and ECG-LVH. Even modestly low GFR levels are independently associated with a higher prevalence of CVD and ECG-LVH.

See Article

ADMISSION BLOOD GLUCOSE LEVEL AS RISK INDICATOR OF DEATH AFTER MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION IN PATIENTS WITH AND WITHOUT DIABETES MELLITUS

The predictive value of admission blood glucose level after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) for long-term prognosis was studied in a large number of patients with and without known diabetes mellitus, particularly in those with unknown diabetes but with blood glucose level in the diabetic range. Admission blood glucose level after AMI independently predicted long-term mortality in patients with and without known diabetes. Subjects with unknown diabetes and admission glucose level of 200 mg/dL (11.1 mmol/L) or higher after AMI had mortality rates comparable to subjects with established diabetes. Admission blood glucose level may serve to identify subjects at high long-term mortality risk, particularly among those with unknown diabetes.

Place holder to copy figure label and caption

Kaplan-Meier survival curves for patients without known diabetes mellitus and admission blood glucose levels less than 141 mg/dL (group 1), 141 to 199 mg/dL (group 2), and 200.0 mg/dL or higher (group 3), and patients with previously diagnosed diabetes (group 4).

Graphic Jump Location

See Article

Figures

Place holder to copy figure label and caption

Kaplan-Meier survival curves for patients without known diabetes mellitus and admission blood glucose levels less than 141 mg/dL (group 1), 141 to 199 mg/dL (group 2), and 200.0 mg/dL or higher (group 3), and patients with previously diagnosed diabetes (group 4).

Graphic Jump Location

Tables

References

Correspondence

CME
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Submit a Comment

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.