Editor's Correspondence |

A Better Alternative for Estimating Renal Function—Reply

Peter J. Swedko, MD; Heather D. Clark, MD; Ayub Akbari, MD
Arch Intern Med. 2003;163(18):2249. doi:10.1001/archinte.163.18.2248-a.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


In reply

The aim of our study was to examine the "real-world" characteristics of serum creatinine as a screening test for chronic kidney disease (CKD) in elderly patients. We demonstrated that a serum creatinine level of 1.7 mg/dL (150 µmol/L) had very poor sensitivity (12.6%) for the detection of CKD. Therefore, we recommend that estimated GFR, and not serum creatinine level, be used for the screening of CKD. While we used the C-G equation to calculate GFR in our study, we do not advocate its use over any other valid method to estimate GFR. The NKF endorses the use of both the C-G equation and the MDRD Study equation as acceptable alternatives to estimate the GFR.1 We selected the C-G equation because it has been extensively validated in a variety of populations, is simple to use, and can be readily applied at the bedside with a basic calculator.1,2 As Bernheim and colleagues point out, the MDRD Study equation appears to provide excellent estimates of GFR. However, it has been less extensively studied and requires the use of a scientific calculator or handheld computer for its application.1 Furthermore, a recent study by Beddhu and colleagues3 calls into question the validity of fundamental assumption of the MDRD Study equation. Ultimately, the question of which equation to use is less important than the concept that GFR, and not the serum creatinine level, is the measure of kidney function.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Topics
PubMed Articles

Users' Guides to the Medical Literature
Table 9.2-1 Refuted Evidence From Nonhuman Studiesa