The renewed discussion and debate on the subject of fever of unknown origin (FUO) have brought me some discomfort after reading the article of Vanderschueren et al1 and accompanying editorial by Bryan.2 I believe that in this age of advanced medical science, the use of the term FUO should have been eliminated years ago. The term FUO sometimes tends to shortcut the need of thorough evaluation for a patient as if this were a real disease. The proposed diagnostic criteria of FUO are imprecise and arbitrary at best, and the evaluation methods applied to every patient to reach the diagnosis are not uniform. As seen in the article by Vanderschueren et al,1 the cause was identified in a large number of cases, although extensive evaluation, which may have a different meaning from one physician to another and from one time to another, might have required more than 3 to 4 weeks after the onset of fever. One physician's final diagnosis based on late diagnosis could be another physician's final diagnosis based on early diagnosis. Similarly, one physician's "no diagnosis"—I presume the authors mean there is no disease—can be another physician's early, intermediate, or late diagnosis. I am surprised to read that in their series "no diagnosis" was labeled for more than one third of patients. I have little doubt that the cause of FUO would be identified in most cases if a thoughtful physician uses his or her knowledge and skills and exercises patience. For instance, for physicians who are insightful with patience and dedication, even factitious fever can be uncovered.3 Besides, if we apply the term FUO to patients with factitious fever due to manipulation of thermometers,4 we might fall into a dangerous trap of deception and will deprive these patients of the care they need.
Thank you for submitting a comment on this article. It will be reviewed by JAMA Internal Medicine editors. You will be notified when your comment has been published. Comments should not exceed 500 words of text and 10 references.
Do not submit personal medical questions or information that could identify a specific patient, questions about a particular case, or general inquiries to an author. Only content that has not been published, posted, or submitted elsewhere should be submitted. By submitting this Comment, you and any coauthors transfer copyright to the journal if your Comment is posted.
* = Required Field
Disclosure of Any Conflicts of Interest*
Indicate all relevant conflicts of interest of each author below, including all relevant financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including, but not limited to, employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speakers’ bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued. If all authors have none, check "No potential conflicts or relevant financial interests" in the box below. Please also indicate any funding received in support of this work. The information will be posted with your response.
Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.
Download citation file:
Web of Science® Times Cited: 1
Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.
More Listings atJAMACareerCenter.com >
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a link to reset your password.
Enter your username and email address. We'll send instructions on how to reset your password to the email address we have on record.
Athens and Shibboleth are access management services that provide single sign-on to protected resources. They replace the multiple user names and passwords necessary to access subscription-based content with a single user name and password that can be entered once per session. It operates independently of a user's location or IP address. If your institution uses Athens or Shibboleth authentication, please contact your site administrator to receive your user name and password.