Editor's Correspondence |

Irritable Bowel Syndrome: New Recommendations for Diagnosis and Treatment

Brian E. Lacy, PhD, MD
Arch Intern Med. 2003;163(11):1374-1375. doi:10.1001/archinte.163.11.1374-a.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


In the September 24, 2001, issue of the ARCHIVES, Dr Fass and colleagues1 presented a state-of-the-art review on the evaluation and treatment of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The authors performed a thorough literature review and, using an evidence-based approach, presented an algorithm on the evaluation and management of patients with IBS.

I would like to alert the readers of this journal to new information regarding the management of IBS that has emerged since the publication of that review. In November 2002, the American College of Gastroenterology published an evidence-based position statement on the utility of diagnostic studies in the evaluation of IBS.2,3 This position statement also included thoughtful recommendations regarding currently available medications for the treatment of IBS. Clinical trials of IBS therapies were reviewed, and a quantitative assessment of study methodology was conducted. In addition, IBS therapies were assessed for their ability to provide global relief of IBS symptoms. Only 2 medications were given the highest recommendation (grade A rating): tegaserod for the treatment of IBS with constipation and alosetron hydrochloride for the treatment of IBS with diarrhea. No other agents (including antispasmodics, bulking agents, antidiarrheals [loperamide], and antidepressants) were found to have met the criteria for high-quality trials or to provide global relief of IBS symptoms.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Web of Science® Times Cited: 1

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Topics
PubMed Articles