British orthopedic surgeons are a skeptical group, and when it comes to chemoprophylaxis for venous thromboembolism, strong opinions are guaranteed to emerge, especially in the light of a new anticoagulant. The editorial by Heit1 clearly highlights the clinical and economic arguments for thromboprophylaxis and succinctly outlines the potential benefits and shortcomings of fondaparinux compared with low-molecular-weight heparin.1 Fondaparinux offers a benefit with an overall 50% reduction in venographic deep vein thrombosis, but without reduction in symptomatic end points at day 11 or in fatal and nonfatal pulmonary embolism and mortality at day 49.2 Even if the venographic reductions translated into fractional reductions in clinical end points, such a marginal reduction must be balanced against an absolute 1% increase in bleeding.1,3 Safety is the central concern of surgeons in the United Kingdom, not marginal increases in efficacy. One of the fondaparinux studies investigated hip fracture and highlighted the need for improved thromboprophylaxis strategy in these patients (fatal thromboembolic events occurred in 1% at day 49).4 As with most clinical trials, the patients with hip fracture were highly selected; those with impaired renal function or any hemorrhagic tendency were excluded. Although the need for improved prophylaxis is clear, elderly, fragile patients with hip fracture must be carefully screened before exposure to fondaparinux, especially given its long half-life and lack of antidote. Given the price premium for fondaparinux (more than 50% in the United Kingdom), I concur with Heit1 that detailed cost-effectiveness analyses, both from a US and a UK perspective, are required before this novel synthetic indirect factor Xa inhibitor can be firmly recommended.
Thank you for submitting a comment on this article. It will be reviewed by JAMA Internal Medicine editors. You will be notified when your comment has been published. Comments should not exceed 500 words of text and 10 references.
Do not submit personal medical questions or information that could identify a specific patient, questions about a particular case, or general inquiries to an author. Only content that has not been published, posted, or submitted elsewhere should be submitted. By submitting this Comment, you and any coauthors transfer copyright to the journal if your Comment is posted.
* = Required Field
Disclosure of Any Conflicts of Interest*
Indicate all relevant conflicts of interest of each author below, including all relevant financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including, but not limited to, employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speakers’ bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued. If all authors have none, check "No potential conflicts or relevant financial interests" in the box below. Please also indicate any funding received in support of this work. The information will be posted with your response.
Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.
Download citation file:
Web of Science® Times Cited: 2
Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.
More Listings atJAMACareerCenter.com >
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a link to reset your password.
Enter your username and email address. We'll send instructions on how to reset your password to the email address we have on record.
Athens and Shibboleth are access management services that provide single sign-on to protected resources. They replace the multiple user names and passwords necessary to access subscription-based content with a single user name and password that can be entered once per session. It operates independently of a user's location or IP address. If your institution uses Athens or Shibboleth authentication, please contact your site administrator to receive your user name and password.