We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Editor's Correspondence |

Predicting Tuberculosis at Hospital Admission

Javier Cobo, MD, PhD; Santiago Moreno, MD, PhD
Arch Intern Med. 2002;162(5):611-612. doi:.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


Wisnivesky et al1 have recently addressed the conflicting issue of whether to place patients in respiratory isolation to prevent the nosocomial transmission of tuberculosis (TB). They provide a clinical rule derived from a case-control study that could avoid a substantial proportion of unnecessary isolation episodes.

We would like to contribute to the debate by commenting on some issues in their work. First, the authors compare patients isolated with a diagnosis of TB (cases) with patients isolated without TB (controls). Nevertheless, the true problem is not to distinguish patients with and without TB among those who have been isolated, but to distinguish them among the whole population of patients admitted to the hospital. In fact, 8 of the 73 patients with TB in this study were never isolated. It is likely that the sensitivity of the model would be lower should these 8 patients be included. Second, the study was performed in a mixed population of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)–infected (55%) and noninfected (45%) patients, but the authors do not mention the proportion of HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients among cases and controls. It is well known that clinical and radiological presentation varies considerably between HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients,2 as well as among HIV-positive patients with different CD4 cell counts.3 Before accepting the validity of the clinical rule for both HIV-positive and HIV-negative individuals, a separate analysis of the model performance in both populations should be performed. We think that 2 separate studies in these 2 populations of patients would better address this issue. Third, it is interesting that the reviewer's final impression appears among the strongest predictors of TB. We have also found that expert clinical judgment is more reliable than prediction models in the decision of whether to place an HIV-infected patient in respiratory isolation,4 thus emphasizing the importance of clinical experience in the management of complex medical decisions. Finally, the interpretation of models derived from clinical practice, such as the models in the study by Wisnivesky et al,1 should take into account that the higher the proportion of patients who are erroneously classified, the easier it is to find models that improve clinical practice.

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles

Promoción de la salud en el ciclo de vida

Promoción de la salud en el ciclo de vida