Editor's Correspondence |

Functional Chest Pain of Presumed Esophageal Origin

Yehuda Ringel, MD; Nicholas J. Shaheen, MD; Douglas A. Drossman, MD
Arch Intern Med. 2002;162(3):365. doi:.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


We read with great interest the recent article, "Evaluation of Patients With Chest Pain and Normal Coronary Angiograms" by Schwartz and Bourassa.1 The article gives a comprehensive review on the pathophysiologic features and the investigational workup of these patients. However, some points regarding chest pain of presumed esophageal origin need to be emphasized. When discussing the causes for esophageal pain, the authors mentioned reflux esophagitis, esophageal motility disorders, long-duration contractions, and hernia incarceration. However, in the majority of these patients complete investigation fails to reveal any significant anatomical, morphological, or biochemical abnormalities. These symptoms may then fall into the category of functional esophageal disorders.2 The diagnosis of functional esophageal disorder is based on clinical (symptom-based) criteria that were recently developed by a multinational working team also known as the "Rome criteria." For functional chest pain of presumed esophageal origin (a term used by the Rome committees), these include chronic complains of (1) midline chest pain or discomfort that is not of burning quality; and (2) absence of pathologic gastroesophageal reflux, achalasia, or other motility disorder with a recognized pathologic basis. The physiological mechanisms underlying these symptoms are still poorly understood. It is currently presumed that a combination of physiological and psychological factors contributes to the generation and severity of these symptoms.


chest pain

Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





February 11, 2002
Leonard Schwartz, MD; Martial G. Bourassa, MD
Arch Intern Med. 2002;162(3):366. doi:.
Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Topics
PubMed Articles

The Rational Clinical Examination
Evidence Summary and Review 1

The Rational Clinical Examination
Evidence Summary and Review 2