0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Research Letter | Less Is More

Computed Tomographic Pulmonary Angiography Clinical Implications of a Limited Negative Result FREE

Shun Yu, MD1; Gopi K. Nayak, MD1; Jeffrey M. Levsky, MD, PhD1; Linda B. Haramati, MD, MS1,2
[+] Author Affiliations
1Departments of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
2Department Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(3):447-449. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.7202.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

A substantial proportion of computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA) results are degraded by patient-related and technical factors, yielding a limited negative interpretation, which qualifies the definitive exclusion of pulmonary embolism. This leads to diagnostic uncertainty and may affect patient management. A multicenter randomized clinical trial of CTPA vs ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy considered CTPA results negative if no pulmonary embolism was demonstrated to the lobar level.1 Investigators have explicitly questioned the clinical relevance of small pulmonary emboli,2,3 and there is growing concern that pulmonary embolism is overdiagnosed on CTPA.4,5

We hypothesized that a limited negative CTPA result portends similar clinical outcomes to a definitively negative result; thus, emphasis on examination limitations may, in fact, be detrimental.

This retrospective cohort study was approved by the institutional review board of the Montefiore Medical Center, which waived written informed consent. Included were all adults with suspected pulmonary embolism who underwent CTPA from July 1, 2011, through June 30, 2012, at the 3 emergency departments or inpatient sites of Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York. We defined a limited negative CTPA result as one that reported no pulmonary embolism but also explicitly stated a limitation or qualification in the report impression. The primary outcome was 90-day venous thromboembolism incidence, a measure of the false-negative rate. Secondary outcomes were additional imaging, initiation of anticoagulation treatment, and bleeding complications.

The study population comprised 2553 patients with mean (SD) age 55 (18) years, 66% women and 85% ethnic minorities. A total of 264 CTPA results (10%) were positive; 1663 (65%) were definitively negative; 569 (22%) were limited negative; and 57 (2%) were nondiagnostic for pulmonary embolism. In all, 25% of negative CTPA results (569 of 2232) were limited negative. Patients with limited negative CTPA results were more similar to patients with definitely negative results than they were to patients with positive results in their baseline characteristics and outcomes (Table 1).

Table Graphic Jump LocationTable 1.  Clinical Characteristics of Study Population

The false-negative rate (90-day venous thromboembolism incidence) for patients with a limited negative CTPA result was 1.4% vs 1.8% for patients with a definitively negative CTPA result (odds ratio [OR], 0.78; 95% CI, 0.35-1.70). This persisted after adjustment for several confounders (Table 2).

Table Graphic Jump LocationTable 2.  Primary and Secondary Outcomes in Patients With a Negative CTPA Result, With and Without Limitations

Patients with limited negative vs definitively negative CTPA results had more additional imaging with ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy (OR, 4.30; 95% CI, 1.83-10.11) and initiation of anticoagulation treatment (OR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.17-1.87). There was a trend toward increased bleeding events (OR, 1.62; 95% CI, 0.98-2.69) in patients with limited vs definitively negative CTPA results.

At the population level, pulmonary embolism diagnosis has essentially doubled since CTPA replaced ventilation-perfusion scanning as the dominant imaging modality for suspected pulmonary embolism in the United States without accompanying changes in risk factors or mortality, but with an increase in bleeding complications.4,5 Patients diagnosed with pulmonary embolism by CTPA have a less severe disease spectrum than those diagnosed with scintigraphy and only half the odds of death.6

The present study demonstrates that patients with limited negative CTPA results in which small emboli cannot be excluded have similar outcomes to those with definitively negative studies. Further diagnostic testing or initiation of anticoagulation therapy is likely unnecessary in a substantial proportion of these patients, and careful consideration of the pretest probability is warranted.

Limitations of this study include its retrospective cohort and its single health system design with the inherent potential for unmeasured confounders, underreporting, and uncaptured events. However, these limitations are unlikely to create a systematic bias.

In conclusion, patients with limited negative CTPA results are indistinguishable from those with definitively negative results in false-negative rate (90-day venous thromboembolism incidence). These patients are more likely to be reimaged with ventilation-perfusion scanning and anti-coagulated. Physicians have grown accustomed to advanced CT technology with submillimeter resolution such that a “limited” study often reflects only a minor deficiency in the usual superb image quality. A limited negative CTPA result should not be automatically interpreted as an indication of clinical uncertainty because the question of “clinically relevant” pulmonary embolism has most likely already been answered.

Corresponding Author: Linda B. Haramati, MD, MS, Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 111 E 210th St, Bronx, NY 10467 (lharamati@gmail.com).

Published Online: January 12, 2015. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.7202.

Author Contributions: Dr Yu had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Study concept and design: Yu, Haramati.

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Yu, Nayak, Levsky, Haramati.

Drafting of the manuscript: Yu, Nayak, Levsky, Haramati.

Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Yu, Levsky, Haramati.

Statistical analysis: Yu.

Administrative, technical, or material support: Yu, Nayak, Haramati.

Study supervision: Levsky, Haramati.

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Haramati’s spouse is a board member of Kryon, Bioprotect, and Orthospace. No other conflicts are reported.

Previous Presentation: Preliminary analysis of these results was presented as an electronic exhibit and informal oral presentation at the Radiological Society of North America Annual Meeting; December 3, 2013; Chicago, Illinois.

Additional Information: Dr Yu is now with the Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

Anderson  DR, Kahn  SR, Rodger  MA,  et al.  Computed tomographic pulmonary angiography vs ventilation-perfusion lung scanning in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2007;298(23):2743-2753.
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Carrier  M, Righini  M, Wells  PS,  et al.  Subsegmental pulmonary embolism diagnosed by computed tomography: incidence and clinical implications: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the management outcome studies. J Thromb Haemost. 2010;8(8):1716-1722.
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Stein  PD, Goodman  LR, Hull  RD, Dalen  JE, Matta  F.  Diagnosis and management of isolated subsegmental pulmonary embolism: review and assessment of the options. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2012;18(1):20-26.
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Burge  AJ, Freeman  KD, Klapper  PJ, Haramati  LB.  Increased diagnosis of pulmonary embolism without a corresponding decline in mortality during the CT era. Clin Radiol. 2008;63(4):381-386.
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Wiener  RS, Schwartz  LM, Woloshin  S.  Time trends in pulmonary embolism in the United States: evidence of overdiagnosis. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(9):831-837.
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Sheh  SH, Bellin  E, Freeman  KD, Haramati  LB.  Pulmonary embolism diagnosis and mortality with pulmonary CT angiography versus ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy: evidence of overdiagnosis with CT? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;198(6):1340-1345.
PubMed   |  Link to Article

Figures

Tables

Table Graphic Jump LocationTable 1.  Clinical Characteristics of Study Population
Table Graphic Jump LocationTable 2.  Primary and Secondary Outcomes in Patients With a Negative CTPA Result, With and Without Limitations

References

Anderson  DR, Kahn  SR, Rodger  MA,  et al.  Computed tomographic pulmonary angiography vs ventilation-perfusion lung scanning in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2007;298(23):2743-2753.
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Carrier  M, Righini  M, Wells  PS,  et al.  Subsegmental pulmonary embolism diagnosed by computed tomography: incidence and clinical implications: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the management outcome studies. J Thromb Haemost. 2010;8(8):1716-1722.
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Stein  PD, Goodman  LR, Hull  RD, Dalen  JE, Matta  F.  Diagnosis and management of isolated subsegmental pulmonary embolism: review and assessment of the options. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2012;18(1):20-26.
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Burge  AJ, Freeman  KD, Klapper  PJ, Haramati  LB.  Increased diagnosis of pulmonary embolism without a corresponding decline in mortality during the CT era. Clin Radiol. 2008;63(4):381-386.
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Wiener  RS, Schwartz  LM, Woloshin  S.  Time trends in pulmonary embolism in the United States: evidence of overdiagnosis. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(9):831-837.
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Sheh  SH, Bellin  E, Freeman  KD, Haramati  LB.  Pulmonary embolism diagnosis and mortality with pulmonary CT angiography versus ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy: evidence of overdiagnosis with CT? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;198(6):1340-1345.
PubMed   |  Link to Article

Correspondence

CME
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

1,308 Views
0 Citations
×

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
Jobs
JAMAevidence.com

The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis
Pulmonary Embolus

The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis
Make the Diagnosis: Pulmonary Embolus