We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Original Investigation |

Fifteen-Year Survival Outcomes Following Primary Androgen-Deprivation Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer

Grace L. Lu-Yao, MPH, PhD1,3,4,6; Peter C. Albertsen, MD5; Dirk F. Moore, PhD2,4; Weichung Shih, PhD2,4; Yong Lin, PhD2,4; Robert S. DiPaola, MD1,4,6; Siu-Long Yao, MD1,4,7
[+] Author Affiliations
1Department of Medicine, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey
2Department of Biostatistics, The Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, New Jersey
3Department of Epidemiology, The Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, New Jersey
4Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick
5Department of Surgery (Urology), University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington
6The Dean and Betty Gallo Prostate Cancer Center, New Brunswick, New Jersey
7Merck Research Laboratories, Kenilworth, New Jersey
JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(9):1460-1467. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.3028.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Importance  One in 6 American men will be diagnosed as having prostate cancer during their lifetime. Although there are no data to support the use of primary androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) for early-stage prostate cancer, primary ADT has been widely used for localized prostate cancer, especially among older patients.

Objective  To determine the long-term survival impact of primary ADT in older men with localized (T1/T2) prostate cancer.

Design, Setting, and Participants  This was a population-based cohort study of 66 717 Medicare patients 66 years or older diagnosed from 1992 through 2009 who received no definitive local therapy within 180 days of prostate cancer diagnosis. The study was conducted in predefined US geographical areas covered by the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. Instrumental variable analysis was used to assess the impact of primary ADT and control for potential biases associated with unmeasured confounding variables. The instrumental variable comprised combined health services areas with various usage rates of primary ADT. The analysis compared survival outcomes in the top tertile areas with those in the bottom tertile areas.

Main Outcomes and Measures  Prostate cancer–specific survival and overall survival.

Results  With a median follow-up of 110 months, primary ADT was not associated with improved 15-year overall or prostate cancer–specific survival following the diagnosis of localized prostate cancer. Among patients with moderately differentiated cancers, the 15-year overall survival was 20.0% in areas with high primary ADT use vs 20.8% in areas with low use (difference: 95% CI, −2.2% to 0.4%), and the 15-year prostate cancer survival was 90.6% in both high- and low-use areas (difference: 95% CI, −1.1% to 1.2%). Among patients with poorly differentiated cancers, the 15-year cancer-specific survival was 78.6% in high-use areas vs 78.5%, in low-use areas (difference: 95% CI, −1.8% to 2.4%), and the 15-year overall survival was 8.6% in high-use areas vs 9.2% in low-use areas (difference: 95% CI, −1.5% to 0.4%).

Conclusions and Relevance  Primary ADT is not associated with improved long-term overall or disease-specific survival for men with localized prostate cancer. Primary ADT should be used only to palliate symptoms of disease or prevent imminent symptoms associated with disease progression.

Figures in this Article

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?


Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Adjusted Prostate Cancer–Specific Survival and Overall Survival in High Use and Low Use of Health Service Areas (HSAs) by Cancer Grade

Results were adjusted for age, race, comorbidity status, cancer stage, zip code income, zip code education, urban area, marital status, year of diagnosis, state buy-in status. A, Prostate cancer–specific survival was similar in areas with high and low use of primary androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) (high use and low use, respectively) among men with moderately differentiated cancer and poorly differentiated cancer. B, Overall survival was similar in high- and low-use areas among men with moderately differentiated cancer and poorly differentiated cancer.

Graphic Jump Location





You need to register in order to view this quiz.
Submit a Comment


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

3 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections