We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Invited Commentary |

The Case for Sex- and Gender-Specific Medicine

C. Noel Bairey Merz, MD1; Vera Regitz-Zagrosek, MD2,3
[+] Author Affiliations
1Barbra Streisand Women’s Heart Center, Cedars Sinai Heart Institute, Los Angeles, California
2Institute for Gender in Medicine, Charite University Medicine, Berlin, Germany
3German Cardiovascular Research Center (DZHK), Berlin, Germany
JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(8):1348-1349. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.320.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


There are numerous differences in cardiovascular disease (CVD) between men and women. Women have a higher prevalence of coronary microvascular dysfunction, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, Tako-Tsubo syndrome (also known as stress-induced cardiomyopathy), and post–myocardial infarction depression than men. Women also have a greater sensitivity to QT-prolonging medications and higher heart failure mortality with digoxin than men.1,2 A mounting literature further documents important sex differences in pharmacology, including response to β-blockers and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors.3



Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Submit a Comment
USPSTF ignored NIH mandate for sex-specific analysis of data
Posted on June 24, 2014
David L. Keller, MD
Independent Physician
Conflict of Interest: None Declared
I agree with the National Institutes of Health (NIH) mandate to include both men and women in clinical studies and, when the studied health condition affects both sexes, to analyze data by sex. The United States Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF) recently updated their report on multivitamin supplements, and again found \"insufficient evidence\" to recommend their general use. The USPSTF report dismissed the significant reduction in cancers seen in men in both the SU.VI.MAX and Physicians' Health Study (PHS II), stating: \"The lack of effect in women and the use of different supplement formulations in the 2 trials make extrapolating these findings to the general population difficult.\"(1) This statement constitutes a clear violation of the NIH mandate to analyze the trial data separately by sex. Please read my \"Open Letter to the USPSTF\" (1) for a more complete analysis of the sex-specific data, and conclusive arguments for reclassifying the use of multivitamin and mineral supplements for men over age 50 to Category C, meaning they should discuss their diet and nutritional status with their doctors to determine whether they should add a nutritional supplement.1: Moyer VA; U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Vitamin, mineral, andmultivitamin supplements for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease andcancer: U.S. Preventive services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2014 Apr 15;160(8):558-64. doi: 10.7326/M14-0198. PubMed PMID: 24566474.2: Keller DL; Open Letter to the USPSTF: the evidence shows multivitamins reduce cancers in men. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24566474#cm24566474_4093
Submit a Comment


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

1 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles