0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Viewpoint |

The Argument Against Reimbursing Physicians for Value

Lara Goitein, MD1
[+] Author Affiliations
1Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Christus St Vincent Regional Medical Center, Santa Fe, New Mexico
JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(6):845-846. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.1063.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Extract

Since the time of Hippocrates, it has been assumed that a physician’s first obligation is to provide the best possible care to individual patients, without distortion by competing societal interests.1 This once near-sacrosanct principle is being tested by the high costs of the health care in the United States, which increasingly threaten the economy. Because physicians control much of the delivery of health care, they have a natural role in helping to control health care costs. But historically, our society has been uneasy about assigning this role to physicians. When people are sick and helpless, do they really want their physicians to be influenced by costs, or do they need to believe that their physicians want only to serve them according to their medical needs?

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

References

Correspondence

CME
Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Submit a Comment
I agree with the author's main points, but.....
Posted on May 5, 2014
David L. Keller, MD
none
Conflict of Interest: None Declared
The decision \"to provide less or cheaper care\" will not \"end up being based on the belief system (or susceptibility to financial incentives) of individual physicians\" for the increasing percentage of employed physicians. Providing less or cheaper care will be mandated by management executives, driven a powerful double incentive: spending less contributes dollars directly to the bottom line, and the cost savings result in additional \"value\" bonuses from Medicare and insurers. Those dual incentives will certainly be passed through to physicians, and are the reason that physician compensation based on \"salary, without bonuses or withholds\" will not be implemented by most organizations which employ physicians. My second observation is that one cited study reported that \"in many geographic areas, higher spending is associated with worse health outcomes\", but another study reported \"that lower spending at the patient or hospital level is associated with poorer outcomes for patients\". The association between higher spending and worse health is counter-intuitive, while the association between lower healthcare spending and worse patient outcomes comports with a belief in modern medicine. How can these opposite outcomes associated with healthcare spending be reconciled?
Submit a Comment

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles
Jobs
JAMAevidence.com

Users' Guides to the Medical Literature
Chapter e23. How to Use an Article About Quality Improvement

brightcove.createExperiences();