We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Comment & Response |

Vertebral Augmentation for Symptomatic Compression Fractures Is Supported by Randomized Clinical Trials—Reply

Douglas C. Bauer, MD1,2
[+] Author Affiliations
1Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
2Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco
JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(2):307-308. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.13024.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


In Reply Drs Levy and Beall, both of whom perform vertebral augmentation procedures and serve as consultants for 1 or more companies that manufacture vertebral augmentation equipment, believe that my Invited Commentary lacks scientific support. They offer an industry-funded study by Papanastassiou et al,1 pooling 27 randomized and nonrandomized studies as evidence that vertebral augmentation is associated with improved subjective outcomes such as pain and quality of life. Unfortunately, unblinded studies with subjective outcomes are particularly prone to bias, and some or all of the apparent superiority of vertebral augmentation in that meta-analysis might be attributed to the fact that all but 2 of the 27 studies were unblinded. They further claim that the 2 blinded randomized trials, which showed no pain or quality-of-life advantage with augmentation,2 had been “downgraded” to “Oxford level 2” in a meta-analysis of randomized trials by Anderson et al,3 but that publication does not provide a detailed description of the process or who made such a decision. The study by Anderson et al3 follows the approach of the industry-sponsored meta-analysis and pools the 2 blinded and 4 unblinded randomized trials with predictable results: pain and quality of life appear to be improved among those who receive vertebral augmentation compared with nonsurgical treatment. Had Anderson et al3 performed a sensitivity analysis limited to the 2 blinded study, as others have done, they would have found that that vertebral augmentation had no meaningful effect on pain or quality of life.


Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





February 1, 2014
Jason R. Levy, MD; Douglas P. Beall, MD
1Department of Interventional Radiology, Northside Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia
2Clinical Radiology of Oklahoma, Edmond
JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(2):307. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.13035.
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...