0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Research Letter |

Trends in Emergency Department Visits for Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions by Elderly Nursing Home Residents, 2001 to 2010 FREE

Julia Brownell, BA1; Joseph Wang, BS2; Alexander Smith, MD, MS, MPH3,4; Caroline Stephens, PhD, MSN, APRN, BC4,5; Renee Y. Hsia, MD, MSc1
[+] Author Affiliations
1Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
2medical student, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
3Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
4Geriatrics, Palliative and Extended Care, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center
5Department of Community Health Systems, University of California, San Francisco
JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(1):156-158. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.11821.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Despite having 24-hour access to health care professionals, nursing home residents have disproportionately high rates of emergency department (ED) visits, a large portion of which are potentially preventable.1,2 These acute care visits, often classified as potentially preventable using ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSCs), can be harmful to residents’ functional outcomes relative to treatment in their familiar setting.3 Given the increase in reporting and enforcement of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ regulations about nursing home quality, we hypothesized that the rate of ED visits for ACSCs by elderly nursing home patients had declined during the last decade.

This study was exempt from review by the University of California, San Francisco Committee on Human Research. We conducted a retrospective analysis of ED visits by elderly nursing home residents using data from the 2001 to 2010 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. We excluded patients who were younger than 65 years (85.3%), had died in the ED (0.5%), or did not reside in a nursing home (88.8%) (see the eMethods in the Supplement).

We used the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality’s Prevention Quality Indicators to identify visits for ACSCs based on International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision diagnosis codes. To calculate rates of ED use per nursing home resident, we used resident-year denominators from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ Online Survey Certification and Reporting data.

Significance of the trends in rates of ED visits for ACSCs and other diagnoses by nursing home patients was assessed using Poisson regression. We further analyzed the distribution of visits for ACSCs by diagnosis and assessed the significance of changes in that distribution using χ2 test across 5 two-year blocks to preserve significant sample sizes.

All analyses were performed using commercially available software. SAS, version 9.2 (SAS Institute Inc) and SUDAAN, version 10.0 (RTI International) were used.

Between 2001 and 2010, the number of ED visits by elderly nursing home patients increased 12.8%, from 1.9 to 2.1 million. Nineteen percent were for ACSCs. The rate of ED visits for ACSCs increased from 263 to 320 visits per 1000 residents (21.8%), but the change was not statistically significant (P = .93) (Figure). The increase in the rate of ED use for non-ACSCs, from 1186 to 1461 visits per 1000 residents (23.2%), was also nonsignificant (P = .94). The rate of ED visits for ACSCs relative to visits for other diagnoses remained constant, fluctuating around 0.22.

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure.
Rates of Emergency Department (ED) Visits per 1000 US Nursing Home Residents for Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions (ACSCs), Non-ACSCs, and Overall, 2001 to 2010

Visit numbers and corresponding visit rates from 2001 to 2004 were adjusted by 0.92 to account for non–nursing home, institutionalized patients (see the eMethods in the Supplement).

Graphic Jump Location

Pneumonia was the most common ACSC in the sample, accounting for 27.9% of all ED visits for ACSCs (Table). Urinary tract infections rose from 23.4% of all visits for ACSCs in 2001-2002 to 33.4% in 2009-2010, although the change in the distribution of diagnoses was not significant (P = .17).

Table Graphic Jump LocationTable.  Emergency Department Visits for Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions (ACSCs) by Diagnosis Among Elderly Nursing Home Residentsa

Despite increasing legislation to monitor and enforce nursing home standards and quality of care, no decrease has occurred in the rate of ED visits for ACSCs during the last decade. The absolute rate of ED visits for ACSCs among elderly nursing home residents (273 visits per 1000 in 2007) was substantially higher than past estimates of ED visit rates for ACSCs in the general adult population (31.9 visits per 1000 in 2007).4 Similarly, their overall ED visit rate (1310 visits per 1000 in 2007) was almost 3 times higher than past estimates of ED use by all Americans older than 65 years (476.8 visits per 1000 in 2007).4

High ED visit rates among elderly nursing home residents are in some ways expected, for ACSCs and overall, given the prevalence of serious illness and disability in this population.5 Furthermore, the uncoordinated payment systems of Medicare and Medicaid, for which most elderly nursing home patients are dual eligible, can incentivize these transfers.5 Evidence6 has shown that reducing these potentially preventable visits has the potential to generate significant savings for public insurance programs.

Corresponding Author: Julia Brownell, BA, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, 1001 Potrero Ave, Room 1E2, San Francisco, CA 94110 (julia.brownell@emergency.ucsf.edu).

Published Online: October 28, 2013. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.11821.

Author Contributions: Dr. Hsia had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Study concept and design: Brownell, Wang, Hsia.

Analysis and interpretation of data: All authors.

Drafting of the manuscript: Brownell, Wang.

Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.

Obtained funding: Hsia.

Administrative, technical, and material support: Brownell.

Study supervision: Smith, Stephens, Hsia.

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Funding/Support: This project was supported by University of California, San Francisco Clinical and Translational Science Institute grant KL2 TR000143 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health (Dr Hsia) and by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Physician Faculty Scholars Program (Dr Hsia).

Role of the Sponsor: The sponsors had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Additional Contributions: Amy Markowitz, JD, provided insightful comments on the manuscript.

Wang  HE, Shah  MN, Allman  RM, Kilgore  M.  Emergency department visits by nursing home residents in the United States. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011;59(10):1864-1872.
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Caffrey C. Potentially Preventable Emergency Department Visits by Nursing Home Residents: United States, 2004. April 2010. National Center for Health Statistics Data Brief 33. http://cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db33.pdf. Accessed September 26, 2013.
Fried  TR, Gillick  MR, Lipsitz  LA.  Short-term functional outcomes of long-term care residents with pneumonia treated with and without hospital transfer. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997;45(3):302-306.
PubMed
Tang  N, Stein  J, Hsia  RY, Maselli  JH, Gonzales  R.  Trends and characteristics of US emergency department visits, 1997-2007. JAMA. 2010;304(6):664-670.
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Vladeck  BC.  The continuing paradoxes of nursing home policy. JAMA. 2011;306(16):1802-1803.
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Grabowski  DC, O’Malley  AJ, Barhydt  NR.  The costs and potential savings associated with nursing home hospitalizations. Health Aff (Millwood). 2007;26(6):1753-1761.
PubMed   |  Link to Article

Figures

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure.
Rates of Emergency Department (ED) Visits per 1000 US Nursing Home Residents for Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions (ACSCs), Non-ACSCs, and Overall, 2001 to 2010

Visit numbers and corresponding visit rates from 2001 to 2004 were adjusted by 0.92 to account for non–nursing home, institutionalized patients (see the eMethods in the Supplement).

Graphic Jump Location

Tables

Table Graphic Jump LocationTable.  Emergency Department Visits for Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions (ACSCs) by Diagnosis Among Elderly Nursing Home Residentsa

References

Wang  HE, Shah  MN, Allman  RM, Kilgore  M.  Emergency department visits by nursing home residents in the United States. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011;59(10):1864-1872.
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Caffrey C. Potentially Preventable Emergency Department Visits by Nursing Home Residents: United States, 2004. April 2010. National Center for Health Statistics Data Brief 33. http://cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db33.pdf. Accessed September 26, 2013.
Fried  TR, Gillick  MR, Lipsitz  LA.  Short-term functional outcomes of long-term care residents with pneumonia treated with and without hospital transfer. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997;45(3):302-306.
PubMed
Tang  N, Stein  J, Hsia  RY, Maselli  JH, Gonzales  R.  Trends and characteristics of US emergency department visits, 1997-2007. JAMA. 2010;304(6):664-670.
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Vladeck  BC.  The continuing paradoxes of nursing home policy. JAMA. 2011;306(16):1802-1803.
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Grabowski  DC, O’Malley  AJ, Barhydt  NR.  The costs and potential savings associated with nursing home hospitalizations. Health Aff (Millwood). 2007;26(6):1753-1761.
PubMed   |  Link to Article

Correspondence

CME
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Submit a Comment

Multimedia

Supplement.

eMethods. Nursing home patient classification.

Supplemental Content

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

1,149 Views
3 Citations

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles
JAMAevidence.com

Users' Guides to the Medical Literature
Introduction

×