We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Invited Commentary |

Intensive Glucose Control in Hyperglycemic Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Still Smoke, but No Fire…

Paresh Dandona, MD, PhD1; William E. Boden, MD2
[+] Author Affiliations
1Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Biomedical Science, University at Buffalo, and the Diabetes and Endocrinology Center of Western New York, Buffalo
2Department of Medicine, Samuel S. Stratton Albany Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Albany Medical Center, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York
JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(20):1905-1906. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.8095.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


For more than 50 years, there has been considerable interest—and ongoing debate—as to the potential clinical benefits of interventions targeted to more intensively control elevated blood glucose levels in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) and, more recently, in those with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). In 1962, Sodi-Pallares et al introduced the glucose-insulin-potassium infusion (GIK) for treatment of acute MI.1,2 In 1972, Maroko and coworkers demonstrated a reduction in infarct size in dogs with experimental MI that were given an infusion of GIK.3 However, the use of GIK treatment for acute MI was largely abandoned over the ensuing years because of doubts and conflicting data about its efficacy, only to see interest return to this treatment when Diaz et al,4 on behalf of the Estudios Cardiológicos Latinoamérica (ECLA) Collaborative Group, showed a dramatic reduction in mortality after an acute MI from 11.5% in the control group to 6.7% in patients treated with GIK.

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

1 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections

The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis
Multivariate Findings for ACI Syndromes

The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis
Evidence Summary and Review 2