We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Comment and Response |

Ascorbic Acid Supplements and Kidney Stone Risk

L. John Hoffer, MD, PhD1
[+] Author Affiliations
1Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(14):1384. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.7731.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


To the Editor In their Research Letter, Thomas et al1 report an increased risk of first-episode renal stone in Swedish men who took ascorbic acid supplements (but no other supplements). This risk is almost certainly overestimated. Cases were identified according to code N20 of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases: calculus of kidney or ureter in the absence of hydroureter (www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/2006-Vol-I.pdf). Contrary to what the authors claim, the symptoms of renal colic are often nonspecific, especially in the absence of hydroureter2,3, and for this reason, nonspecific abdominal or flank pain frequently prompts an investigation for renal stone.2,3 As many as 40% of renal stones identified by means of imaging studies are asymptomatic4—not surprisingly, since the prevalence of renal stone in asymptomatic men is 10%.5 The fact that physicians and the general public are repeatedly warned that ascorbic acid supplements cause renal stones (even though the evidence is inconclusive) predictably lowers the threshold for testing for them. Thus, all other things being equal, takers of high-dose ascorbic acid supplements are much more likely than nontakers to be investigated for renal stone, artificially increasing the number of code N20 cases linked to vitamin C. These factors, combined with the authors’ sole reliance on registry entries for case identification, strongly expose their study to the important epidemiological error of “confounding by indication.”


Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





July 22, 2013
Hans-Göran Tiselius, MD; Agneta Åkesson, PhD; Laura D. K. Thomas, MSc
1Department of Clinical Science, Intervention, and Technology, CLINTEC, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
2Institute of Environmental Medicine, Division of Nutritional Epidemiology, Karolinska Institutet
JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(14):1384a. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.7699.
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Related Collections