0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Research Letter |

Incentivizing Residents to Document Inpatient Advance Care Planning FREE

Joshua R. Lakin, MD1,3; Elizabeth Le, MD2; Michelle Mourad, MD3; Harry Hollander, MD4; Wendy G. Anderson, MD, MS1,3
[+] Author Affiliations
1Palliative Care Program, University of California, San Francisco
2Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California
3Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
4Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(17):1652-1654. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.8158.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Discussing preferences for care near the end of life increases the likelihood that patients will receive care consistent with their preferences.14 Recent work5 demonstrates that medical professionals infrequently ask about and document preferences for patients upon hospitalization. Because most end-of-life discussions occur in hospitals,6 we implemented a quality improvement program incentivizing resident physicians to consistently document key information about inpatient advance care planning discussions in a timely manner in an accessible location.

We conducted the project between July 1, 2011, and May 31, 2012, on the medical service at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), where the Medical Center and departments of medicine and graduate medical education collaborated to form the Housestaff Incentive Program. In this program, trainees choose quality improvement goals and faculty mentor trainee champions through design and implementation of projects. If goals are met, all trainees receive a financial incentive. Internal Medicine residents selected the goal of improving documentation of advance care planning discussions on the basis of pilot work and experience that inconsistent documentation was a barrier to honoring patients’ wishes on transitions of care. Input from key stakeholders, including emergency department, outpatient, hospital, and palliative care providers, informed the intervention, especially location and content of documentation. The project included 3 key elements; the details of each of these are included in the Table. To assess documentation rates, program residents reviewed charts of a random sample of recently discharged patients on a biweekly basis. The UCSF institutional review board approved the project.

The Figure shows implementation of key aspects of the intervention and the percentage of discharge summaries that included the required documentation by project month. Documentation rates are based on medical record review of 1474 patients, comprising 55.5% of those discharged from the medical service during the project period. Rates rose from 22.2% at the beginning of the program to more than 90% by October and remained near this level through May. In comparison, documentation rates for patients discharged from an attending-only service, which used the electronic template but did not receive the financial incentive or feedback, were 0% to 50% with a yearly mean of 11.7%.

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure.
Percentage of Discharge Summaries With Required Documentation

Required documentation, completed within 48 hours of discharge, included whether the patient had expressed wishes for care and identified a surrogate decision maker. Dashed line indicates program target completion rate of 75%.

Graphic Jump Location

We implemented a multifaceted intervention to improve resident documentation of advance care planning discussions in a consistent format and location. We believe that the discharge summary template and the financial incentive program provided the foundation for the observed increase in documentation rates. However, rates did not begin to increase until we implemented and refined performance feedback, indicating that this aspect was essential. Further work should be designed to demonstrate which specific interventions are most important.

Several limitations of this project warrant consideration. A key limitation was that we did not measure patient outcomes, and doing so will be critical in future work. In addition, we did not track documentation rates after the end of the project. Future programs should focus on sustainability, for example, by electronic medical record automation of audit and feedback. Finally, it is possible that factors other than the intervention contributed to the increase in rates that we observed during the course of the program.

In conclusion, our trainee-led quality improvement project, including a structured electronic medical record template, a financial incentive, and performance feedback, increased timely documentation of inpatient advance care planning discussions. Our results highlight the effectiveness of engaging residents in quality improvement activities. In addition, they present the possibility that such an incentive program could improve patient outcomes by ensuring that their wishes are available across care transitions.

Corresponding Author: Joshua R. Lakin, MD, Palliative Care Program, University of California, San Francisco, 2320 Sutter St, Ste 102, San Francisco, CA 94115 (jrlakin@gmail.com).

Published Online: July 15, 2013. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.8158.

Author Contributions: Dr Lakin had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Study concept and design: All authors.

Acquisition of data: Lakin, Le.

Analysis and interpretation of data: Lakin, Le, Mourad, Hollander.

Drafting of the manuscript: Lakin, Le, Mourad, Hollander.

Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.

Statistical analysis: Le.

Administrative, technical, and material support: Lakin, Hollander.

Study supervision: Mourad, Hollander, Anderson.

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Funding/Support: The University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), Medical Center and Department of Graduate Medical Education funded this project. The UCSF Clinical and Translational Science Institute Career Development Program, supported by National Institutes of Health grant KL2 RR024130, funded Dr Anderson.

Previous Presentation: Dr Lakin presented this work at the Annual Assembly of the American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine; March 15, 2013; New Orleans, Louisiana.

Additional Contributions: Sumant Ranji, MD, Krishan Soni, MD, and Rebecca Sudore, MD, all from UCSF, provided leadership and guidance in managing this program. In addition, Ari Hoffman, MD, Jeffrey Dixson, MD, Ajay Dharia, MD, YinChong Mak, MD, Christopher Moriates, MD, Kara Bischoff, MD, and Aparna Goel, MD, also all from UCSF, built and refined this project and generated the required momentum to complete this incentive program.

Mack  JW, Weeks  JC, Wright  AA, Block  SD, Prigerson  HG.  End-of-life discussions, goal attainment, and distress at the end of life: predictors and outcomes of receipt of care consistent with preferences. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(7):1203-1208.
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Schneiderman  LJ, Kronick  R, Kaplan  RM, Anderson  JP, Langer  RD.  Effects of offering advance directives on medical treatments and costs. Ann Intern Med. 1992;117(7):599-606.
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Detering  KM, Hancock  AD, Reade  MC, Silvester  W.  The impact of advance care planning on end of life care in elderly patients: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2010;340:c1345. doi:10.1136/bmj.c1345.
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Silveira  MJ, Kim  SYH, Langa  KM.  Advance directives and outcomes of surrogate decision making before death. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(13):1211-1218.
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Heyland  DK, Barwich  D, Pichora  D,  et al; ACCEPT (Advance Care Planning Evaluation in Elderly Patients) Study Team; Canadian Researchers at the End of Life Network (CARENET).  Failure to engage hospitalized elderly patients and their families in advance care planning. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(9):778-787. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.180.
PubMed
Mack  JW, Cronin  A, Taback  N,  et al.  End-of-life care discussions among patients with advanced cancer: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156(3):204-210.
PubMed   |  Link to Article

Figures

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure.
Percentage of Discharge Summaries With Required Documentation

Required documentation, completed within 48 hours of discharge, included whether the patient had expressed wishes for care and identified a surrogate decision maker. Dashed line indicates program target completion rate of 75%.

Graphic Jump Location

Tables

References

Mack  JW, Weeks  JC, Wright  AA, Block  SD, Prigerson  HG.  End-of-life discussions, goal attainment, and distress at the end of life: predictors and outcomes of receipt of care consistent with preferences. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(7):1203-1208.
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Schneiderman  LJ, Kronick  R, Kaplan  RM, Anderson  JP, Langer  RD.  Effects of offering advance directives on medical treatments and costs. Ann Intern Med. 1992;117(7):599-606.
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Detering  KM, Hancock  AD, Reade  MC, Silvester  W.  The impact of advance care planning on end of life care in elderly patients: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2010;340:c1345. doi:10.1136/bmj.c1345.
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Silveira  MJ, Kim  SYH, Langa  KM.  Advance directives and outcomes of surrogate decision making before death. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(13):1211-1218.
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Heyland  DK, Barwich  D, Pichora  D,  et al; ACCEPT (Advance Care Planning Evaluation in Elderly Patients) Study Team; Canadian Researchers at the End of Life Network (CARENET).  Failure to engage hospitalized elderly patients and their families in advance care planning. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(9):778-787. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.180.
PubMed
Mack  JW, Cronin  A, Taback  N,  et al.  End-of-life care discussions among patients with advanced cancer: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156(3):204-210.
PubMed   |  Link to Article

Correspondence

CME
Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Submit a Comment

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles