Comment and Response |

Accurately Estimating Cervical Cancer Screening Overuse Among Older Women

David T. Liss, PhD1,2; David W. Baker, MD, MPH1,2,3
[+] Author Affiliations
1Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
2Center for Advancing Equity in Clinical Preventive Services, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
3Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(13):1266. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.6846.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


To the Editor In their recent article, Kale and colleagues1 use data from the 1999 and 2009 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) and the outpatient component of the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) to analyze trends in overuse and misuse of health care services. They report that between 1999 and 2009, the rate of ordering cervical cancer screening at study visits declined from 3.1% to 2.2%. These findings belie the fact that cervical cancer screening among women 65 years and older remains extremely common and highly problematic. Because this study reported cervical cancer screening orders at single visits, it gives the spurious impression that such testing is unusual. Even if we account for the fact that elderly patients typically make multiple outpatient visits per year, Kale and colleagues’ estimated rate of annual screening seems far too low.


Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





July 8, 2013
Minal S. Kale, MD, MPH; Alex D. Federman, MD, MPH; Salomeh Keyhani, MD, MPH
1Division of General Internal Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York
2Division of General Internal Medicine, University of California, San Francisco3San Francisco Veterans Affairs Hospital, San Francisco, California
JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(13):1266-1267. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.7408.
Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...