We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Viewpoint |

The Complexity of Integrating Speed and Safety in Drug Development and Approval

R. Alta Charo, JD1
[+] Author Affiliations
1School of Law and Department of Medical History and Bioethics, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin–Madison
JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(13):1165-1166. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.7161.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


Speed and safety in the development and approval of new medications have too long been viewed as a zero-sum tradeoff. Some have called for more accelerated approval processes for drugs. Others want more robust postmarket surveillance and more aggressive actions to limit or withdraw approved drugs when appropriate. Although both views have some merit, a more comprehensive and collaborative approach is needed to better align industry incentives and patient interests. Approaches that accelerate drug approval (pharmacogenomics, biomarkers, surrogate end points, and abbreviated trials) should be integrated with postmarket measures (conditional approval, limited licensing, and limitations on direct-to-consumer advertising and off-label promotion). Because the postmarket measures may make pharmaceutical investments less profitable, new financial incentives for industry may be needed, such as research grants, tax credits, awards for reaching successive preclinical stages of drug development, and prizes for notable innovations.

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

1 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles
Drugs in early clinical development for the treatment of osteosarcoma. Expert Opin Investig Drugs Published online Sep 15, 2016;
Development of Ayurveda - Tradition to Trend. J Ethnopharmacol Published online Sep 12, 2016;