We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Editor's Correspondence |

The Demise of the “Evil Specialists”: Class Warfare of Specialists vs Primary Care Physicians Fostered by Elimination of the Consultation Code

John A. Goldman, MD, MACR, CCD
JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(12):1155. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.984.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


The article “Unintended Consequences of Eliminating Medicare Payments for Consultations” provides interesting insight into the planning of those who designed this insulting plan.1 The most cost-effective diagnosis is the correct diagnosis.2 I am a solo rheumatologist and find this entire concoction an insult to those of us who provide in-depth care to people with complex musculoskeletal problems.2 It is a program to encourage class warfare between the “evil specialists” and the downtrodden primary care physicians. This program was ill defined for those who are caring specialist physicians. Though none of the authors are practicing physicians, they should have also looked at this program through the eyes of the patients and those of us who care for them. Nothing has been calculated to measure the quality of care as a result of this coding change. I realize that this is beyond the scope of this article, but the real insult of this ill-conceived program needs to be carefully considered and not just through spending cost. You need a cost-benefit analysis. All that is offered is a cost analysis. The “complexity” section, which discussed more visits and higher codes and visit numbers, is not a substitute for quality care, and it could be that this program limited the patient's ability to access the sophisticated care of those who have the expertise—“the evil specialists.” This may have actually decreased the quality of health care of those who need specialists. It was a deliberate program to dumb down the care of patients and not designed in any way to improve their quality of care. It specifically endangers patients with complex medical problems and fosters medical class warfare. It is telling me that I as an evil specialist should not spend as much time evaluating patients. How does that improve their care? You need both specialists and primary care physicians to care for people. You do not need to vilify one group against the other. What I do now is still labeled by me as a consultation, I am just paid less! Medicare may be spending more but not to me.

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic

The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis
Original Article: Can the Clinical History Distinguish Between Organic and Functional Dyspepsia?

The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis