0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
In This Issue of JAMA Internal Medicine |

In This Issue of JAMA Internal Medicine FREE

JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(11):946. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.63.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

The MACE service is a novel model of care designed to deliver specialized interdisciplinary care to hospitalized older adults to improve patient outcomes. To evaluate the impact of the MACE service, Hung et al conducted a prospective, matched cohort study of patients 75 years or older admitted to a tertiary hospital for an acute illness to either the MACE service or medicine service. Admission to the MACE service was associated with lower rates of adverse events (9.5% vs 17.0%), shorter hospital length of stay by 0.8 days, and better satisfaction.

Doshi challenges the basic assumptions of officials and professional societies to treat influenza as a major public health threat for which the annual vaccine offers a safe and effective solution, showing that there is no good evidence that vaccines reduce serious complications of influenza. Promotional messages conflate “influenza” (disease caused by influenza viruses) with “flu” (a syndrome with many causes, of which influenza viruses appear to be a minor contributor). This lack of precision causes physicians and potential vaccine recipients to have unrealistic assumptions about the vaccine's potential benefit and impedes dissemination of the evidence on nonpharmaceutical interventions against respiratory diseases. Also, unexpected and serious adverse effects of influenza vaccines have occurred. The decisions surrounding influenza vaccines need to include a discussion of these risks and benefits.

Puetz et al conducted a systematic review of randomized clinical trials to summarize the effect of exposure to creative arts therapies (CAT) on psychological symptoms and quality of life (QoL) among patients with cancer during treatment and follow-up. Twenty-seven investigations that included both randomization to either a CAT or control condition and a measure of anxiety, depression, pain, fatigue, and/or QoL were selected. Meta-regression analyses examined whether the effects varied according to patient characteristics and modifiable features of CAT and clinical settings. Findings indicated that exposure to CAT reduced anxiety, depression, and pain and increased QoL during cancer treatment; fatigue was not significantly reduced. Exposure to CAT only significantly reduced pain during follow-up.

To assess the impact of the interdisciplinary Acute Care for Elders (ACE) model on costs, Flood et al conducted a retrospective cohort study of hospitalist patients 70 years or older spending the entirety of their hospitalization in either the ACE or usual care (UC) unit. Variable direct cost was chosen as the primary outcome because it represents the cost stemming directly from daily patient care. The authors found significantly reduced mean (SD) variable direct cost per patient for ACE compared with UC ($2109 [$1870] vs 2480 [$2113]; P = .009). Adjusted cost ratios revealed significant cost savings for patients with low (0.82; 95% CI, 0.72-0.94) and moderate (0.74; 95% CI, 0.62-0.89) case-mix index scores; care was cost neutral for patients with high case-mix index scores (1.13; 95% CI, 0.93-1.37). Significantly fewer ACE patients were readmitted within 30 days of discharge compared with UC (7.9% vs 12.8%; P = .02).

Hirsch et al performed a comprehensive, systematic analysis of oncology clinical trials registered with ClinicalTrials.gov between October 2007 and September 2010 to better understand the strengths and weaknesses of ongoing cancer research. Of 40 970 interventional studies registered during that time frame, 22% focused on oncology. Oncology trials were more likely to be single arm, open label, and nonrandomized compared with trials in other diseases. One-third of trials were conducted completely outside the United States, and there was only moderate correlation between the number of trials focused on a specific cancer type and the respective incidence or mortality. These and other results highlight the crucial need to better understand the trials being performed and to develop metrics with which to guide trial design to ensure that reliable, relevant data are generated to inform clinical care.

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

Tables

References

Correspondence

CME
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Submit a Comment

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.