We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Editor's Correspondence |

Testing Times: We Are Still Some Way From Getting the Best Out of Sensitive Troponin Assays—Reply

Tobias Reichlin, MD; Christian Mueller, MD, FESC
JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(6):477-478. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.2787.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


In reply

We thank Kavsak and Carlton and colleagues for taking interest in our article.1

The points raised by Kavsak give us the opportunity to clarify 2 important details that might have lead to misunderstandings. First, the algorithm (including the values for absolutes changes used) was derived and validated data driven.1 This approach is in contrast to the theoretical considerations and their extrapolations described by Kavsak. Second, the best cut-off levels for specific diagnostic decisions such as the rule-out or the rule-in of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) often differ from the 99th percentile, a level defined to differentiate normal levels from elevated levels. The algorithm aims to best separate patients with AMI from patients with other causes of chest pain, that might also have minor hs-cTnT elevations for various reasons. It is therefore not surprising that the best cut-off value for hs-cTnT to rule-in AMI is higher than the 99th percentile. A large multicenter study designed for external validation of our results is currently enrolling patients. We agree with Kavsak and Carlton and colleagues that the 3-hour algorithm suggested by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines should be followed until these results become available.



Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





March 25, 2013
Edward Watts Carlton, MBChB, MCEM; James Hugo Phillimore Gamble, MA, Cantab, BMBCh, MRCP; Kim Greaves, BSc, MD, FACC, FRCP
JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(6):477-478. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.2273.
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles