We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
In This Issue of JAMA Internal Medicine |

In This Issue of JAMA Internal Medicine FREE

JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(5):333. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.2704.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

To examine motivations for using dietary supplement, Bailey et al analyzed data from 11 956 adults in the 2007-2010 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. The most commonly reported reasons were to “improve” (45%) or “maintain” (33%) overall health. Women used calcium products for “bone health” (36%), whereas men were more likely to report supplement use for “heart health or to lower cholesterol” (18%). Older adults were more likely than younger adults to report motivations related to site-specific reasons such as heart, bone and joint, and eye health. Multivitamin-mineral products were the most frequently reported type of supplement taken, followed by calcium and ω-3 or fish oil supplements. Less than a quarter of supplements used by adults were recommended by a physician or health care provider.

See Article

Michtalik et al surveyed more than 500 hospitalist attending physicians about their practice environments, clinical workload, and perceptions regarding the frequency of an unsafe census. Physicians rated the impact of average census on process and outcome measures using a Likert scale. Forty percent of hospitalists reported unsafe workloads at least monthly. Nearly one-quarter of hospitalists reported that excess workload had an adverse impact on patient outcomes. Twenty-two percent of physicians reported ordering potentially unnecessary tests, procedures, or consults because of not having adequate time.

See Article

This study describes the content of conflicts of interest (COI) policies for US state Medicaid drug selection committees. Policy documents from 27 Medicaid programs were available for analysis. In general, COI policies were not readily available, were highly variable, and had inconsistent enforcement and management of COI. This variability suggests that some policies may not adequately protect drug selection decisions against COI and industry influence. This article describes model core components of a COI policy for disclosure, management, and review of COI within drug selection committees.

See Article

In this study, Weitzman et al engaged an online diabetes social network in reporting about recent and severe hypoglycemia and related patient-centered harms using a privacy-preserving software application that supports bidirectional communication and feedback of research results. They found high prevalence of hypoglycemia. Of 613 respondents, 301 (49.1%) reported experiencing more than 4 episodes of “going low” in the past 2 weeks, using a patient-centered measure, whereas 29.2% reported 1 or more episode of severe hypoglycemia in the past year; 16.6% reported both more than 4 recent lows and 1 or more severe low in the past year. The participatory surveillance model uses consumer engagement in disease-centered online social networks, establishing a new channel between researchers, public health, and individuals.

See Article

Good decision making about prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening involves men considering how they value the different potential outcomes, but the effects of different methods of helping men consider such values have not been well studied. This study compared 3 methods of values clarification: (1) a balance sheet, (2) rating and ranking task, and (3) a discrete choice experiment in 911 US and Australian men recruited from a survey research firm. The different techniques produced different responses for the most important decision attribute and some differences in the proportion of men preferring the PSA-like option in an unlabeled choice task. However, intent for PSA screening was high and did not differ by values clarification technique when respondents answered a labeled question about intent to have PSA testing, suggesting a strong labeling effect.

See Article

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview




Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.