Original Investigation |

Centralized, Stepped, Patient Preference–Based Treatment for Patients With Post–Acute Coronary Syndrome Depression:  CODIACS Vanguard Randomized Controlled Trial

Karina W. Davidson, PhD; J. Thomas Bigger, MD; Matthew M. Burg, PhD; Robert M. Carney, PhD; William F. Chaplin, PhD; Susan Czajkowski, PhD; Ellen Dornelas, PhD; Joan Duer-Hefele, RN; Nancy Frasure-Smith, PhD; Kenneth E. Freedland, PhD; Donald C. Haas, MD, MPH; Allan S. Jaffe, MD; Joseph A. Ladapo, MD, PhD; Francois Lespérance, MD; Vivian Medina, MSW; Jonathan D. Newman, MD, MPH; Gabrielle A. Osorio, BS; Faith Parsons, BS; Joseph E. Schwartz, PhD; Jonathan A. Shaffer, PhD; Peter A. Shapiro, MD; David S. Sheps, MD; Viola Vaccarino, MD, PhD; William Whang, MD, MS; Siqin Ye, MD
JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(11):997-1004. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.915.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Importance Controversy remains about whether depression can be successfully managed after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and the costs and benefits of doing so.

Objective To determine the effects of providing post-ACS depression care on depressive symptoms and health care costs.

Design Multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Setting Patients were recruited from 2 private and 5 academic ambulatory centers across the United States.

Participants A total of 150 patients with elevated depressive symptoms (Beck Depression Inventory [BDI] score ≥10) 2 to 6 months after an ACS, recruited between March 18, 2010, and January 9, 2012.

Interventions Patients were randomized to 6 months of centralized depression care (patient preference for problem-solving treatment given via telephone or the Internet, pharmacotherapy, both, or neither), stepped every 6 to 8 weeks (active treatment group; n = 73), or to locally determined depression care after physician notification about the patient's depressive symptoms (usual care group; n = 77).

Main Outcome Measures Change in depressive symptoms during 6 months and total health care costs.

Results Depressive symptoms decreased significantly more in the active treatment group than in the usual care group (differential change between groups, −3.5 BDI points; 95% CI, −6.1 to −0.7; P = .01). Although mental health care estimated costs were higher for active treatment than for usual care, overall health care estimated costs were not significantly different (difference adjusting for confounding, −$325; 95% CI, −$2639 to $1989; P = .78).

Conclusions For patients with post-ACS depression, active treatment had a substantial beneficial effect on depressive symptoms. This kind of depression care is feasible, effective, and may be cost-neutral within 6 months; therefore, it should be tested in a large phase 3 pragmatic trial.

Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01032018

Figures in this Article

Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours


Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Graphic Jump Location

Figure 1. CONSORT diagram of the Comparison of Depression Interventions after Acute Coronary Syndrome (CODIACS) Vanguard trial.

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Graphic Jump Location

Figure 2. Comparison of the Comparison of Depression Interventions after Acute Coronary Syndrome (CODIACS) Vanguard trial with other trials of depression treatments in coronary heart disease and primary care patients.20,22,2934 *This trial included participants with elevated depressive symptoms; other trials included only patients with major depressive disorder. It is also important to note that some of these trials had more active control conditions, leading possibly to smaller depression differences between groups. Full-information maximum-likelihood estimates were used to determine intention-to-treat treatment effects; other trials may have used other estimating methods. IPT indicates interpersonal psychotherapy; RCT, randomized controlled trial. A larger Hedges g indicates a stronger positive effect of the tested intervention. Vertical dashed lines indicate the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the Hedges g estimates from the 3 meta-analyses. Horizontal solid line indicates the 95% CI for each individual study.

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Graphic Jump Location

Figure 3. Comparison of health care use costs during the 6 months between treatment groups.




Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Web of Science® Times Cited: 2

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Topics
PubMed Articles

The Rational Clinical Examination
Evidence Summary and Review 2

The Rational Clinical Examination
Multivariate Findings for ACI Syndromes