0
Review Article | Less Is More

Reassurance After Diagnostic Testing With a Low Pretest Probability of Serious Disease:  Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Alexandra Rolfe, MBChB; Christopher Burton, MD
JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(6):407-416. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.2762.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Importance  Diagnostic tests are often ordered by physicians in patients with a low pretest probability of disease to rule out conditions and reassure the patient.

Objective  To study the effect of diagnostic tests on worry about illness, anxiety, symptom persistence, and subsequent use of health care resources in patients with a low pretest probability of serious illness.

Evidence Acquisition  Systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, PsychINFO, CINAHL, and ProQuest Dissertations electronic databases through December 31, 2011, for eligible randomized controlled trials. We independently identified studies for inclusion and extracted the data. Disagreements were resolved by discussion. We performed meta-analysis if heterogeneity was low or moderate (I2 < 50%).

Results  Fourteen randomized controlled trials that included 3828 patients met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed with outcomes categorized as short term (≤3 months) or long term (>3 months). Three trials showed no overall effect of diagnostic tests on illness worry (odds ratio, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.55-1.39]), and 2 showed no effect on nonspecific anxiety (standardized mean difference, 0.06 [−0.16 to 0.28]). Ten trials showed no overall long-term effect on symptom persistence (odds ratio, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.85-1.15]). Eleven trials measured subsequent primary care visits. We observed a high level of heterogeneity among trials (I2 = 80%). Meta-analysis after exclusion of outliers suggested a small reduction in visits after investigation (odds ratio, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.62-0.96]).

Conclusions and Relevance  Diagnostic tests for symptoms with a low risk of serious illness do little to reassure patients, decrease their anxiety, or resolve their symptoms, although the tests may reduce further primary care visits. Further research is needed to maximize reassurance from medically necessary tests and to develop safe strategies for managing patients without testing when an abnormal result is unlikely.

Figures in this Article

Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours

Figures

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Grahic Jump Location

Figure 1. Flowchart indicating selection of studies for inclusion. Reasons for exclusion of trials exceed the numbers of excluded trials owing to more than 1 reason applied to some trials.

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Grahic Jump Location

Figure 2. Risk of bias summary.

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Grahic Jump Location

Figure 3. Effect of diagnostic testing on reduction of illness concern. The size of the data marker corresponds to the relative weight assigned in the pooled analysis using random-effects models. OR indicates odds ratio.

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Grahic Jump Location

Figure 4. Effect of diagnostic testing on anxiety. The size of the data marker corresponds to the relative weight assigned in the pooled analysis using random-effects models. SMD indicates standardized mean difference.

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Grahic Jump Location

Figure 5. Effect of diagnostic testing on presenting symptoms. The size of the data marker corresponds to the relative weight assigned in the pooled analysis using random-effects models. OR indicates odds ratio.

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Grahic Jump Location

Figure 6. Effect of diagnostic testing on primary care visits. OR indicates odds ratio.

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

References

Correspondence

CME


You need to register in order to view this quiz.
NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s “Cited By” API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Topics
PubMed Articles
Jobs