0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Editor's Correspondence |

Lactobacilli vs Antibiotics to Prevent Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections: An Inconclusive, Not Inferior, Outcome—Reply

Marielle Beerepoot, MD; Gerben ter Riet, MD, PhD; Suzanne E. Geerlings, MD, PhD
Arch Intern Med. 2012;172(21):1690-1694. doi:10.1001/2013.jamainternmed.111.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Extract

In reply

We thank Dr Faasse for his thoughtful comments. We agree that it would have been clearer to use the term “inconclusive” instead of the one we used.

As far as we are aware, there are no validated rules to determine noninferiority margins. Nor can there be, since almost every clinical situation has its own peculiarities. What constitutes a clinically acceptable difference is ultimately a matter of judgment and may vary across patients, physicians, investigators, regulators, or payers.1 It is striking but perhaps not surprising that in trial registrations of noninferiority trials, the noninferiority margins are very often absent.2 A rational approach to planning noninferiority trials would involve performing a cost-utility analysis to derive the noninferiority margins before embarking on the trial. Such analyses could incorporate the different opinions of the various stakeholders.

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

References

Correspondence

November 26, 2012
Mark Adrian Faasse, MD
Arch Intern Med. 2012;172(21):1690-1694. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2012.4427.
CME
Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Submit a Comment

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles
Jobs
JAMAevidence.com

Users' Guides to the Medical Literature
Clinical Resolution

Users' Guides to the Medical Literature
Clinical Scenario

brightcove.createExperiences();