Editor's Correspondence |

Generic Competition in a Flawed System: Pill Them, Bill Them—Reply

Nicholas S. Downing, AB; Joseph S. Ross, MD, MHS; Harlan M. Krumholz, MD, SM
Arch Intern Med. 2012;172(19):1522-1523. doi:10.1001/2013.jamainternmed.806.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


In reply

Hay questions whether consumers were actually harmed by Abbott's branded reformulations of fenofibrate, suggesting that Abbott likely offered rebates and discounts to payers in an effort to improve formulary position. Our article included an analysis of wholesale prices for fenofibrate that showed that Abbott's branded reformulations were twice as costly as generics.1 Given this difference in price, generic fenofibrate almost certainly would be listed on a more favorable formulary tier than branded versions, even if Abbott was offering significant rebates or discounts. Thus, patients who continued to use branded fenofibrate likely faced higher copayments than those using generic formulations. In addition, the continued use of branded formulations likely increased overall health care costs, which impose indirect costs on patients through higher insurance premiums. Hay also draws attention to the findings of the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) trial, which showed that fenofibrate did not reduce cardiovascular risk when added to statin therapy.1 We agree that the broad use of fenofibrate, especially the more costly branded reformulations, should be re-evaluated in light of this study.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





October 22, 2012
Alain Braillon, MD, PhD
Arch Intern Med. 2012;172(19):1522-1523. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2012.4389.
Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Topics

Users' Guides to the Medical Literature
Clinical Resolution

Users' Guides to the Medical Literature
Clinical Scenario