Invited Commentary |

Coping With Rising Health Care Costs :  Comment on “Cost-effectiveness of Enhanced Depression Care After Acute Coronary Syndrome”

Roy C. Ziegelstein, MD; Brett D. Thombs, PhD
Arch Intern Med. 2012;172(21):1684-1685. doi:10.1001/2013.jamainternmed.114.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


The Coronary Psychosocial Evaluation Studies (COPES) randomized controlled trial examined patient satisfaction with depression care (the primary outcome) and depressive symptom reduction, major adverse cardiac events that required hospitalization, and death (secondary outcomes) associated with treatment of depressed mood that persisted at least 3 months after an acute coronary syndrome (ACS).1 In the COPES trial, patients with ACS were evaluated soon after their acute cardiac event with the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and individuals with a score of 10 or more were then reassessed 3 months later. Patients with persistent symptoms (BDI score of ≥10 at 3 months) were then randomized to usual care by the patients' treating physicians or to 6 months of a patient preference-based, stepped-care intervention that offered problem-focused psychotherapy or antidepressant medication. The COPES trial reported that enhanced depression care improved patient satisfaction with treatment and reduced depressive symptoms compared with usual care. The report by Ladapo et al2 suggests that these promising results can be realized while simultaneously reducing health care costs.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Topics
PubMed Articles

The Rational Clinical Examination
Evidence Summary and Review 2

The Rational Clinical Examination
Multivariate Findings for ACI Syndromes