Editor's Correspondence |

Misconstrued Intentions: Setting the Record Straight

Victor Novack, MD, PhD; David J. Cohen, MD, MSc; Donald E. Cutlip, MD
Arch Intern Med. 2012;172(18):1425-1427. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2012.3752.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


We read with interest the Invited Commentary by Drs Alpert and Jaffe1 on our article “Troponin Criteria for Myocardial Infarction After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.”2 Although they make several excellent points and we agree with many of their assertions, we believe that several issues that they have raised warrant comment.

In particular, we were disappointed to discover that the objective and major conclusions of our study were misinterpreted within the commentary. As clearly outlined in the article, our aim was to compare the effects of a troponin- or creatine kinase–MB (CKMB)-based definition of periprocedural myocardial infarction (MI) on event frequency and the association of these events with 1-year mortality. Our results indicated a significant difference in sensitivity such that the frequency of troponin MI (troponin values >3 times the upper limit of normal [ULN]) was more than 3-fold higher than CKMB MI (CKMB values >3 times the ULN). Moreover, although elevations of both troponin and CKMB levels were prognostically important, a comparable association between biomarker elevation and 1-year mortality was observed at much higher relative elevations of troponin than CKMB. Our article did not suggest a preference for CKMB or state that CKMB assays were more reliable based on longer-term use.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





October 8, 2012
Allan Jaffe, MD; Joseph Alpert, MD
Arch Intern Med. 2012;172(18):1425-1427. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2012.4125.
Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
PubMed Articles