0
Invited Commentary |

No Place for Novel Oral Anticoagulants in Current Treatment of Acute Coronary Syndromes:  Comment on “Use of New-Generation Oral Anticoagulant Agents in Patients Receiving Antiplatelet Therapy After an Acute Coronary Syndrome”

Adrian V. Hernandez, MD, PhD
Arch Intern Med. 2012;172(20):1546-1547. doi:10.1001/2013.jamainternmed.293.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Extract

Nonplatelet mechanisms may have a role in these events; therefore, other drugs have been tested. Warfarin sodium has been used among patients with ACS in combination with aspirin vs aspirin alone, showing a significant decrease in recurrent events but also a significant increase in major bleeding events with the combined treatment.2

In contrast to warfarin, novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs), such as direct thrombin inhibitors and anti-Xa, do not require monitoring and have minimal food and drug interactions. Moreover, compared with warfarin NOACs have demonstrated significant reductions in thrombotic events and lower rates of major bleeding events in patients having atrial fibrillation and in patients undergoing knee and hip surgery.3 In recent years, several phase 2 and phase 3 trials of NOACs for the treatment of patients with ACS have been published, with most of the patients receiving dual antiplatelet treatment. Although recent detailed review articles have described the pros and cons of the use of NOACs in ACS,4,5 the available evidence has not been quantitatively summarized.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours

First Page Preview

View Large
/>
First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

References

Correspondence

CME
Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Web of Science® Times Cited: 3

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Topics
PubMed Articles
Jobs
JAMAevidence.com

The Rational Clinical Examination
Evidence Summary and Review 2

The Rational Clinical Examination
Multivariate Findings for ACI Syndromes

brightcove.createExperiences();