0
Special Article | Less Is More| Less Is More

Application of “Less Is More” to Low Back Pain

Shubha V. Srinivas, MD, MPH; Richard A. Deyo, MD, MPH; Zackary D. Berger, MD, PhD
Arch Intern Med. 2012;172(13):1016-1020. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2012.1838.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

An initiative of the National Physicians Alliance, the project titled “Promoting Good Stewardship in Clinical Practice,” developed a list of the top 5 activities in primary care for which changes in practice could lead to higher-quality care and better use of finite clinical resources. One of the top 5 recommendations was “Don't do imaging for low back pain within the first 6 weeks unless red flags are present.” This article presents data that support this recommendation. We selectively reviewed the literature, including recent reviews, guidelines, and commentaries, on the benefits and risks of routine imaging in low back pain. In particular, we searched PubMed for systematic reviews or meta-analyses published in the past 5 years. We also assessed the cost of spine imaging using data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. One high-quality systematic review and meta-analysis focused on clinical outcomes in patients with low back pain and found no clinically significant difference in pain or function between those who received immediate lumbar spine imaging vs usual care. Published data also document harms associated with early imaging for low back pain, including patient “labeling,” unneeded follow-up tests for incidental findings, irradiation exposure, unnecessary surgery, and significant cost. Routine imaging should not be pursued in acute low back pain. Not imaging patients with acute low back pain will reduce harms and costs, without affecting clinical outcomes.

Figures in this Article

Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours

Figures

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Graphic Jump Location

Figure 1. Improvement in pain (A) and function (B) among patients with low back pain who received immediate lumbar imaging (intervention) vs usual care (control). Adapted from Chou et al7 with permission from the publisher. CT indicates computed tomography; MR, magnetic resonance; RDQ, Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire; SF-36, 36-Item Short Form Health Survey; VAS, visual analog scale.

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Graphic Jump Location

Figure 2. Estimation of patients receiving routine imaging for low back pain in 1 year.

Tables

References

Correspondence

CME


You need to register in order to view this quiz.
NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Web of Science® Times Cited: 8

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Topics
PubMed Articles
Jobs
JAMAevidence.com
brightcove.createExperiences();