Medication reconciliation, in some form or another, is now standard of care in most hospitals and an expectation of The Joint Commission and Accreditation Canada. In their systematic review of hospital-based medication reconciliation practices, Mueller et al1 offer a useful reminder of the literature supporting this widespread adoption and suggest some future challenges.
Similar to many contemporary innovations in practice, medication reconciliation is not a single act or intervention. Instead, it involves a “bundle” of related critical elements applied during the high-risk period of hospitalization. Hospitals are grappling with some essential questions: What strategies for medication reconciliation are most effective? Which patients will benefit most? Is admission or discharge reconciliation most essential? Which health care professionals should lead and contribute?2 This review illustrates that medication reconciliation is not a single intervention but rather takes place at various transitions (ie, admission, transfer, and discharge), involves a range of pharmacy expertise (ie, pharmacy technicians to clinical pharmacists), and may variously include all patients or target patients at high risk for adverse clinical outcomes (eg, adverse drug events and rehospitalizations).
Thank you for submitting a comment on this article. It will be reviewed by JAMA Internal Medicine editors. You will be notified when your comment has been published. Comments should not exceed 500 words of text and 10 references.
Do not submit personal medical questions or information that could identify a specific patient, questions about a particular case, or general inquiries to an author. Only content that has not been published, posted, or submitted elsewhere should be submitted. By submitting this Comment, you and any coauthors transfer copyright to the journal if your Comment is posted.
* = Required Field
Disclosure of Any Conflicts of Interest*
Indicate all relevant conflicts of interest of each author below, including all relevant financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including, but not limited to, employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speakers’ bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued. If all authors have none, check "No potential conflicts or relevant financial interests" in the box below. Please also indicate any funding received in support of this work. The information will be posted with your response.
Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.
Download citation file:
Web of Science® Times Cited: 2
Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.
More Listings atJAMACareerCenter.com >
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a link to reset your password.
Enter your username and email address. We'll send instructions on how to reset your password to the email address we have on record.
Athens and Shibboleth are access management services that provide single sign-on to protected resources. They replace the multiple user names and passwords necessary to access subscription-based content with a single user name and password that can be entered once per session. It operates independently of a user's location or IP address. If your institution uses Athens or Shibboleth authentication, please contact your site administrator to receive your user name and password.