We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Editor's Correspondence |

Dabigatran and Myocardial Infarction: Meta-Illusion?

Luis C. L. Correia, MD, PhD; Antonio A. Lopes, MD, MPH, PhD
Arch Intern Med. 2012;172(10):823. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2012.836.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


We read with great interest the article by Uchino and Hernandez.1 By performing a meta-analysis of 7 randomized trials, they suggested that dabigatran therapy is associated with increased risk of myocardial infarction (MI) or acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Even though meta-analyses provide strong evidence for efficacy and safety, the role of chance should always be taken into account before definite conclusions.

The suspicion that MI risk could be higher in patients receiving dabigatran compared with warfarin was raised by the results of the landmark Randomized Evaluation of Long Term Anticoagulant Therapy (RE-LY) Trial, which enrolled more than 18 000 patients with atrial fibrillation.2 Dabigatran was associated with lower risk of the primary outcome (stroke or systemic embolism) and showed similar risk of the primary safety outcome (major hemorrhage). However, MI, one of several secondary outcomes, had an annual incidence of 0.74% for patients randomized to dabigatran therapy, 150 mg twice daily, and 0.53% for warfarin, corresponding to a 38% higher risk. On the basis on this finding, Uchino and Hernandez performed the meta-analysis, which apparently confirms the suspicion: a 33% higher risk of MI or ACS in patients taking dabigatran. However, we should recognize the possibility of this finding resulting from methodological artifact.

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





May 28, 2012
Ken Uchino, MD; Adrian V. Hernandez, MD, PhD
Arch Intern Med. 2012;172(10):823. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2012.1154.
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections

The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis
Evidence To Support The Update

The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis
Quick Reference