We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Editor's Correspondence |

Multimodality Evoked Potentials in the Diagnosis and Management of Neurological Sarcoidosis

Robert P. Baughman, MD; Elyse E. Lower, MD
Arch Intern Med. 1998;158(9):1036. doi:.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


In reply

We agree with Simon's comments that the use of evoked potentials may be of value in diagnosing sarcoidosis. In our own study, we did not routinely use multimodality evoked potentials. We agree that there is literature suggesting that visual, auditory, and somatosensory evoked potentials can identify neurosarcoidosis when other techniques have failed to do so. It appears that this technique is more sensitive than neuroradiological films or lumbar puncture. We would like to mention a recent article by Gott et al1 that describes 25 patients with no evidence of neurosarcoidosis. Twelve had abnormal findings of multimodality evoked potentials, suggesting a much higher incidence of these abnormalities than is shown by clinical evidence from neurosarcoidosis. It is not yet clear to us whether a patient with an abnormal evoked potential finding but with no other evidence of neurosarcoidosis should be treated.


Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





May 11, 1998
Michael R. Simon, MD, FACP
Arch Intern Med. 1998;158(9):1036. doi:.
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.