We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Editor's Correspondence |

The Patient-Centered Medical Home: Friend or Foe?—Reply

Asaf Bitton, MD, MPH; Joseph Frolkis, MD, PhD
Arch Intern Med. 2012;172(6):524-525. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2012.42.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


In reply

We thank Dr Volpintesta for his comments on our Commentary.1 However, we respectfully disagree with a number of his assertions. First, he contends that “many primary care physicians already act as if they are PCMHs” and that this leads to job dissatisfaction. In fact, the current evidence about both the rather limited spread of patient-centered medical homes (PCMHs) across the United States to date2,3 and clearly improved health care provider experience within fully transformed PCMH clinics3 would suggest exactly the opposite. Second, he suggests that while primary care physicians will need to be paid extra income to accommodate increased responsibilities under the PCMH model, they would not be able to realize this income because of expanded team staffing. While it is true that upfront investment in PCMH team capacity through hiring of more staff and implementation of electronic health records will cost money, we would posit that this is an important, long-overdue, and even mandatory investment in primary care capacity during this rapidly emerging era of care accountability and cost-trend management. Furthermore, some early evidence suggests that primary care providers do not necessarily reduce their incomes once they transform; some have even seen their income grow under the PCMH model.2,4

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





March 26, 2012
Edward J. Volpintesta, MD
Arch Intern Med. 2012;172(6):524-525. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2011.1873.
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
PubMed Articles