0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Editor's Correspondence |

Dietary Supplements and Altered Mortality: A Conflict of Evolutionary Medicine

Mark David Lucock, PhD
Arch Intern Med. 2012;172(5):448-449. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2011.1861.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Extract

The findings of Mursu et al1 are welcome and support what many nutritional scientists believe, that too little or excess micronutrient intake is detrimental to health. Nutritional wisdom is contemporaneous. During the first half of the 20th century we were concerned with undernutrition and defining deficiency syndromes. From the mid-1970s, this focus shifted to overnutrition and chronic degenerative disorders. Today we seem to be facing up to the excesses of recent years where, for example, supraphysiologic intake of beta carotene can promote certain cancers while an ever increasing number of adverse findings are being linked to mandatory folic acid intake.2 To quote Francis Crick (with slight modification), “Almost all aspects of life are engineered at the molecular level, and without understanding molecules, and their interactions, we can only have a very sketchy understanding of life itself.”3 With this in mind, we raise the following possible explanations for the findings of Mursu et al.1

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

References

Correspondence

CME
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Submit a Comment

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Web of Science® Times Cited: 1

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles
Jobs
brightcove.createExperiences();