Editor's Correspondence |

A Counterargument to Encounter Frequency and Target Achievement: Measurement Variability—Reply

Fritha Morrison, MPH; Maria Shubina, ScD; Alexander Turchin, MD, MS
Arch Intern Med. 2012;172(4):374-375. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2011.1414.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


In reply

We agree with Hayen et al that, similar to any retrospective analysis, our study has a number of limitations. However, to address these limitations, we examined the data in many ways, each validating our conclusions.

Specifically to address the concerns of Hayen et al about measurement variability, we conducted 2 analyses. First, we compared the first elevated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), blood pressure (BP), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) measurements after controlled periods with encounter frequencies shorter vs longer than the median encounter frequency (2.15, 2.29, and 1.99 months for patients with hyperglycemic, hypertensive, and hyperlipidemic periods, respectively). When comparing patients with controlled encounter frequencies lower than vs greater than or equal to the median, initial elevated HbA1c measures both had medians of 7.5% for hyperglycemic patients; initial systolic BP medians were both 138 mm Hg and diastolic BP medians were both 80 mm Hg for hypertensive patients; and initial LDL-C measures had a median of 120 vs 119 mg/dL (to convert to millimoles per liter, multiply by 0.0259) for hyperlipidemic patients, respectively.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





February 27, 2012
Andrew Hayen, MBiostat, PhD; Katy Bell, MBBCh, PhD; Paul Glasziou, FRACGP, PhD; Les Irwig, MBBCh, PhD
Arch Intern Med. 2012;172(4):374-375. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2011.807.
Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Topics
PubMed Articles