Author Affiliations: Division of Cardiology (Dr Afonso), Department of Internal Medicine (Drs Rathod, Bharadwaj, Badheka, and Afonso), Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan; Department of Cardiology, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri (Dr Kizilbash); and Department of Cardiology, University of Miami, Miami, Florida (Dr Badheka).
The Healthy Eating Index (HEI) is a tool developed by the US Department of Agriculture's Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion in 1995 for evaluating diet quality and monitoring changes in dietary practices in the US population.1 Prior studies have demonstrated an association between a “good” HEI score and lower incidence of cardiovascular disease2,3 and accompanying risk factors.4,5 However, literature on the prognostic utility of HEI in an exclusively geriatric population is sparse. We sought to investigate whether there is a correlation between favorable HEI scores and all-cause as well as cardiovascular mortality in the elderly US population.
The public access data set of the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey between the years 1988 and 1994 (n = 33 994) was analyzed, and a total of 3884 patients aged 65 years or older with HEI data were included in our study.
The HEI comprises 10 dietary components that measure diet quality. The original scoring system totals 100 points (optimal diet) and gives equal weight to all 10 components (0-10 each). The HEI accounts for age and sex when creating the index scores based on serving sizes. Details of the HEI score are available at ftp://ftp.cdc.gov/pub/Health_Statistics/NCHS/nhanes/nhanes3/6A/hei-acc.pdf. Our study population was stratified into 3 categories according to HEI scores (>80 indicates a “good” diet; 51-80, a diet that “needed improvement” [fair]; and <51, a “poor” diet).6,7 Mortality data up to December 31, 2006, were analyzed using national linkage records and death certificates (mean [SD] follow-up, 161.6  person-months). Cardiovascular causes of mortality were identified using the International Statistical Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision codes. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional regression analyses were carried out to calculate the hazard ratios (HRs) using all-cause mortality and cardiovascular death as the dependent variables. Baseline age, sex, diabetes, myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, stroke, hypertension, race, body mass index, total cholesterol level, poverty to income ratio, and current smoking were adjusted for in the multivariate analysis. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were obtained across the 3 categories and compared using the log-rank statistic. All analyses were performed using SAS statistical software (version 9.2; SAS Institute Inc).
The mean (SD) age of the study cohort was 73.5 (0.2) and the mean (SD) HEI score was 68.7 (0.4). In the “good,” “fair,” and “poor” HEI groups, the mean (SD) HEI scores were 85.3 (0.5), 67.2 (0.6), and 43.5 (0.8), respectively. A total of 2738 persons (70.5%) died during the follow-up of 9.6 person-years, with 1315 cardiovascular deaths (34%). The “good” HEI group, compared with the “fair” and “poor” groups, had fewer total deaths (62% vs 71% vs 78%, respectively [P = .001]) and cardiovascular deaths (33% vs 34% vs 36%, respectively [P = .001]). Healthy Eating Index scores were inversely associated with all-cause mortality on both univariate (HR, 0.991; 95% CI, 0.987-0.994 [P < .001]) and multivariate analyses (HR, 0.991; 95% CI, 0.988-0.994 [P < .001]). Similar results were also obtained for cardiovascular death (HR, 0.993; 95% CI, 0.988-0.997 [P = .002]). The Figure shows the Kaplan-Meier survival estimates.
Figure. Kaplan-Meier curves for cumulative survival from all-cause mortality (A) and cardiovascular mortality (B) in the 3 Healthy Eating Index (HEI) groups.
Our findings suggest that a good HEI score is associated with a lower overall and cardiovascular mortality compared with a poor HEI score in the elderly US population. Interestingly, poverty to income ratio did not seem to affect the eating habits in the study population. Although the HEI has undergone several modifications in the past decade, we used the original HEI to conform to the dietary patterns and risk factors prevalent in the 1980s and 1990s.7
Our results are in agreement with 2 prior large cohort studies that reported that HEI scores were associated with a moderately lowered risk of cardiovascular disease (myocardial infarction or stroke) in men and women.2,3 A similar risk reduction in chronic disease, particularly for cardiovascular disease, was also reported by the same investigators using an “alternate” HEI.8 However, these studies evaluated a cohort of health care professionals who were mostly in their fifties, in contrast to our study that included a nationally representative cohort of elderly individuals.
There are several studies to explain the observed mortality benefit with a good HEI score. In the Supplementation en Vitamines et Mineraux Antioxydants (SU.VI.MAX) study (n = 5081, aged 35-61 years), higher HEI scores were associated with healthier lifestyles and higher socioeconomic status.9 Similar to the results of our study, higher HEI scores have been previously linked to favorable health behaviors, such as physical activity, nonsmoking, and higher use of preventive medical services,3,8 and shown to be associated with a lower body mass index.4 Modest associations between HEI scores and lower blood pressure were observed in the SU.VI.MAX study, but these findings were applicable only to men.9 Likewise, the possibility of a correlation between HEI and plasma biomarkers of chronic inflammation has also been reported.5
Our study reveals that only 18% of the American population older than 65 years have a good HEI score, whereas the remaining 82% present opportunities for improvement (poor or fair HEI score). Despite a higher prevalence of comorbidities like hypertension, diabetes, smoking, coronary artery disease, and stroke, along with the advanced age in our study cohort, a good HEI score was found to reduce the risk of death by 37% (HR, 0.63). These results underscore the need for public health intervention in this population subset, with a “never too late” attitude. In addition to raising awareness, providing healthy alternatives and dietary instruction could have a favorable impact on cardiovascular outcomes in the elderly population.
Correspondence: Dr Afonso, Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Wayne State University, Harper University Hospital, 3990 John R, 8 Brush, Detroit, MI 48201 (firstname.lastname@example.org).
Author Contributions:Study concept and design: Rathod, Bharadwaj, Badheka, and Afonso. Acquisition of data: Rathod, Badheka, and Kizilbash. Analysis and interpretation of data: Rathod, Badheka, and Kizilbash. Drafting of the manuscript: Rathod, Bharadwaj, Badheka, and Afonso. Critical revision of the manuscript for importantintellectual content: Rathod, Bharadwaj, Badheka, Kizilbash, and Afonso. Statistical analysis: Rathod. Administrative, technical, and material support: Rathod, Bharadwaj, Kizilbash, and Afonso. Study supervision: Rathod, Badheka, Kizilbash, and Afonso.
Financial Disclosure: None reported.
Thank you for submitting a comment on this article. It will be reviewed by JAMA Internal Medicine editors. You will be notified when your comment has been published. Comments should not exceed 500 words of text and 10 references.
Do not submit personal medical questions or information that could identify a specific patient, questions about a particular case, or general inquiries to an author. Only content that has not been published, posted, or submitted elsewhere should be submitted. By submitting this Comment, you and any coauthors transfer copyright to the journal if your Comment is posted.
* = Required Field
Disclosure of Any Conflicts of Interest*
Indicate all relevant conflicts of interest of each author below, including all relevant financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including, but not limited to, employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speakers’ bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued. If all authors have none, check "No potential conflicts or relevant financial interests" in the box below. Please also indicate any funding received in support of this work. The information will be posted with your response.
Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.
Download citation file:
Web of Science® Times Cited: 8
Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.
Users' Guides to the Medical Literature
Clarifying Your Question
Users' Guides to the Medical Literature
Three Examples of Question Clarification
All results at
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a link to reset your password.
Enter your username and email address. We'll send instructions on how to reset your password to the email address we have on record.
Athens and Shibboleth are access management services that provide single sign-on to protected resources. They replace the multiple user names and passwords necessary to access subscription-based content with a single user name and password that can be entered once per session. It operates independently of a user's location or IP address. If your institution uses Athens or Shibboleth authentication, please contact your site administrator to receive your user name and password.