We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Editor's Correspondence |

The International Normalized Ratio Range of 2.0 to 3.0 Remains Appropriate for Atrial Fibrillation

Daniel E. Singer, MD; Margaret C. Fang, MD, MPH; Alan S. Go, MD
Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(21):2032. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2009.419.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


Torn et al1 conclude that the target international normalized ratio (INR) for atrial fibrillation (AF) should be 3.0 to 3.4, rather than the standard INR range of 2.0 to 3.0,2 based on a Leiden Thrombosis Centre cohort observed from 1994 to 1998. We believe that their data do not support their conclusion.

Precisely comparing the efficacy of adjacent INR intervals demands large numbers of relevant outcome events. Even if one accepts all the events reported by Torn et al1 as relevant, the total number is too small. The confidence intervals of crude incidence rates across INR intervals from 2.0 through 3.5 highly overlap. We found no assertion that an INR range of 3.0 to 3.4 was statistically significantly different from lower INR intervals. Furthermore, as the authors acknowledge, patients with AF are anticoagulated to prevent ischemic strokes. Torn et al1 report 15 ischemic strokes, reflecting an extraordinarily low rate of 0.4% per year—far too few events to sustain the analysis. All major bleeding events were included, even though only intracranial hemorrhages (ICHs) have an impact similar to ischemic strokes, which anticoagulants are used to prevent. Indeed, ICHs account for 90% of all fatal and disabling events among anticoagulation-related hemorrhages in AF.3 Only 21 ICHs were observed—again, too few to sustain their analysis. Torn et al1 report that when outcomes are limited to life-threatening events, an INR from 2.0 to 3.0 is, in fact, optimal. Their report also fails to address potential confounding across INR categories.

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Submit a Comment


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles

The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis
Original Article: Does This Patient Have a Hemorrhagic Stroke?

The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis
Original Article: Does This Patient Have a Hemorrhagic Stroke?