0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Editor's Correspondence |

Cardiovascular Device Technology and Health Care Cost

Larry S. Dean, MD, FSCAI
Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(18):1689. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2011.464.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Extract

We strongly agree that quality, cost savings, and comparative effectiveness are critically important elements for the future of interventional cardiology and for our health care system. The use of drug-eluting stents (DESs) off label should not be equated to inappropriate care, as Dr Redberg has suggested in her Editor's Note in the article by Groeneveld et al.1 The application of therapy should be based on the evidence, only a small portion of which is typically based on the Food and Drug Administration–labeled indications for a device or drug. To diminish the life-saving properties of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and DESs is misguided and a disservice to the patients whose lives have been saved, whose quality of life has been improved, and who will benefit in the future from DESs and other interventional therapies.

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

References

Correspondence

October 10, 2011
Rita F. Redberg, MD, MSc
Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(18):1689. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2011.465.
CME
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Submit a Comment

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles
Jobs
JAMAevidence.com

Users' Guides to the Medical Literature
Cost: Just Another Outcome?

Users' Guides to the Medical Literature
Did Investigators Adopt a Sufficiently Broad Viewpoint?

brightcove.createExperiences();