0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Editor's Correspondence |

Method of Estimating Sodium Intake and Its Possible Influence on NHANES III Outcome—Reply

Quanhe Yang, PhD; Tiebin Liu, MSPH; Elena V. Kuklina, MD, PhD; W. Dana Flanders, MD, ScD; Yuling Hong, MD, PhD; Muin J. Khoury, MD, PhD; Frank B. Hu, MD, PhD
Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(22):2063-2064. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2011.591.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Extract

In reply

We appreciate the letters by Jürgens and Cohen et al regarding our article.1 Compared with earlier analyses,2 we included an additional follow-up (2000-2006), leading to substantially improved statistical power. We also estimated usual intakes of sodium and potassium using validated National Cancer Institute methodology that allows to adjust for day-to-day intake variation, minimizing bias in estimation of nutrient-health associations.3 As expected, a single 24-hour recall led to substantial misclassifications; approximately 40% and 32% of subjects were reclassified by comparing quartiles of day 1 vs the usual sodium and potassium intakes, respectively (eTable 1). In addition, our findings were consistent with another study using the 24-hour urinary excretion of sodium and potassium, which is a more reliable measurement of the intake.4 Although some of the associations in our study appear to be stronger in certain subgroups such as overweight individuals, none of the test results for interactions were significant.

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

References

Correspondence

December 12, 2011
Gesche Jürgens, PhD, MD
Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(22):2063-2064. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2011.590.
CME
Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Submit a Comment

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles
Jobs
brightcove.createExperiences();