0
In This Issue of Archives of Internal Medicine |

In This Issue of Archives of Internal Medicine FREE

Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(17):1525. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2011.421.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

QUALITY OF CARE IN THE US TERRITORIES

The US territories—Puerto Rico, American Samoa, the Northern Mariana Islands, Guam, and the US Virgin Islands—are home to 5 million residents, almost all of whom self-identify as racial/ethnic minorities. However, the US territories are often excluded from national reports of health care equity and quality. Comparing hospital performance on core process measures for patients hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), heart failure (HF), and pneumonia (PNE), hospitals in the US territories (n = 57) have significantly lower performance on all core process measures than hospitals in the US states (n = 4799). Hospitals in the US territories also have significantly higher 30-day mortality rates than hospitals in the states. Overall, this study highlights the need to improve health care outcomes in the US territories as part of the national effort to tackle racial/ethnic health care inequities.

See Article

ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD REMINDERS AND PANEL MANAGEMENT TO IMPROVE PRIMARY CARE OF ELDERLY PATIENTS

This study assessed the effectiveness of electronic medical record (EMR) reminders, with or without panel management, on completion of health care proxy, osteoporosis screening, and influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations in patients older than 65 years. Physicians were assigned to 1 of 3 arms: EMR reminder alone, EMR reminder plus panel manager, or usual care. During a 1-year study period, EMR reminders were effective in helping physicians deliver higher-quality care. Electronic medical record reminders alone facilitated significant improvement in influenza and pneumococcal vaccination rates, while EMR reminders with panel management facilitated significant improvement in health care proxy designation and osteoporosis screening rates.

See Article

TOO LITTLE? TOO MUCH? PRIMARY CARE PHYSICIANS' VIEWS ON US HEALTH CARE

Some believe that a substantial amount of US health care is unnecessary, suggesting that it would be possible to control costs without rationing effective services. Between June and December 2009, Sirovich et al conducted a nationally representative mail survey of US primary care physicians randomly selected from the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile. Forty-two percent of US primary care physicians believe that patients in their own practice are receiving too much care; only 6% said they were receiving too little. Malpractice reform, realignment of financial incentives, and more time with patients could remove pressure on physicians to do more than they feel is needed.

See Article

ENCOUNTER FREQUENCY AND SERUM GLUCOSE LEVEL, BLOOD PRESSURE, AND CHOLESTEROL LEVEL CONTROL IN PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS

More frequent patient-provider encounters for patients with diabetes may lead to faster hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), blood pressure, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) control and improve outcomes, but there are no guidelines for how frequently patients should be seen. This study by Morrison et al examined 26 496 patients with diabetes and elevated HbA1c, blood pressure, and/or LDL-C level, who were treated by primary care physicians at 2 teaching hospitals in eastern Massachusetts from 2000 to 2009. They found that encounters with physicians once every 1 to 2 weeks greatly decreased the median time to control of elevated HbA1c, blood pressure, and LDL-C level, compared with those with encounters every 3 to 6 months, as currently practiced by most physicians. These findings suggest that biweekly primary care provider encounters were associated with fastest achievement of HbA1c, blood pressure, and LDL-C targets for patients with diabetes.

See Article

COFFEE, CAFFEINE, AND RISK OF DEPRESSION AMONG WOMEN

Lucas et al accessed data from the Nurses' Health Study, a large cohort of US women, to examine prospectively whether caffeine consumption or intake of certain caffeine-containing beverages is associated with depression risk. During 10 years of follow-up (1996-2006), the authors identified 2607 incident cases of depression. Compared with women consuming caffeinated coffee less frequently (≤1 cup/wk), multivariate relative risk (RR) of depression was 0.85 (95% CI, 0.75-0.95) for those consuming 2 to 3 cups/d and 0.80 (95% CI, 0.64 to 0.99; P value for trend, <.001) for those consuming 4 cups/d or more. In this large longitudinal study, Lucas et al found that depression risk decreases with increasing caffeinated coffee consumption.

See Article

First Page Preview

View Large
/>
First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

References

Correspondence

CME
Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.