A few weeks ago, I had the type of emergency department shift I dread. All the patients I saw were dying. But for 2 patients in particular, I was struck by the difference in care at the end of their lives.
In the first bay lay a woman with severe respiratory distress who appeared much older than her actual age of 62 years. She had the look I know too well of someone with multiple chronic medical conditions, so I asked the resident to review the medical chart. “Over 40 pack-year tobacco history, former IVDU on methadone, Hep C, asthma, poorly controlled diabetes, end stage renal disease on hemodialysis, multiple abdominal surgeries and ostomy due to a complicated cholecystectomy.” Her breathing quickened and grew more labored as her oxygen saturation dropped. We barely spoke, but I told her what I planned, yelling above the noise so she could hear me. “We have to put in a breathing tube. Is that okay?” She gave a quick nod. Then I paralyzed and sedated her, performed direct laryngoscopy, and passed the tube between her pearly white cords. I put in a central line, ordered a stat portable chest radiograph, and called the intensive care unit team. I knew that any other emergency medicine attending physician would probably have performed the same procedures and called the same consults, but I wondered if I had done the best for the patient. I have seen this scenario play out too often. While she may survive this hospitalization, her quality of life will be poor and she will suffer. We were managing her from one crisis to the next, without real pause to discuss her wishes or her prognosis.
Thank you for submitting a comment on this article. It will be reviewed by JAMA Internal Medicine editors. You will be notified when your comment has been published. Comments should not exceed 500 words of text and 10 references.
Do not submit personal medical questions or information that could identify a specific patient, questions about a particular case, or general inquiries to an author. Only content that has not been published, posted, or submitted elsewhere should be submitted. By submitting this Comment, you and any coauthors transfer copyright to the journal if your Comment is posted.
* = Required Field
Disclosure of Any Conflicts of Interest*
Indicate all relevant conflicts of interest of each author below, including all relevant financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including, but not limited to, employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speakers’ bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued. If all authors have none, check "No potential conflicts or relevant financial interests" in the box below. Please also indicate any funding received in support of this work. The information will be posted with your response.
Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.
Download citation file:
Web of Science® Times Cited: 1
Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.
More Listings atJAMACareerCenter.com >
Users' Guides to the Medical Literature
Users' Guides to the Medical Literature
All results at
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a link to reset your password.
Enter your username and email address. We'll send instructions on how to reset your password to the email address we have on record.
Athens and Shibboleth are access management services that provide single sign-on to protected resources. They replace the multiple user names and passwords necessary to access subscription-based content with a single user name and password that can be entered once per session. It operates independently of a user's location or IP address. If your institution uses Athens or Shibboleth authentication, please contact your site administrator to receive your user name and password.